TSTP Solution File: SWC206+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SWC206+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 07:22:24 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.29s
% Output   : Solution 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25714/SWC206+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25714/SWC206+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25714/SWC206+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 25810
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.031 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>(neq(X1,X2)<=>~(X1=X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax15)).
% fof(2, axiom,ssList(nil),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax17)).
% fof(7, axiom,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>(segmentP(nil,X1)<=>nil=X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax58)).
% fof(96, conjecture,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|~(neq(X2,nil)))|neq(X1,nil))|(~(nil=X3)&nil=X4))|(![X5]:(ssList(X5)=>((~(neq(X5,nil))|~(segmentP(X4,X5)))|~(segmentP(X3,X5))))&neq(X4,nil))))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', co1)).
% fof(97, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|~(neq(X2,nil)))|neq(X1,nil))|(~(nil=X3)&nil=X4))|(![X5]:(ssList(X5)=>((~(neq(X5,nil))|~(segmentP(X4,X5)))|~(segmentP(X3,X5))))&neq(X4,nil)))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[96])).
% fof(103, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|~(neq(X2,nil)))|neq(X1,nil))|(~(nil=X3)&nil=X4))|(![X5]:(ssList(X5)=>((~(neq(X5,nil))|~(segmentP(X4,X5)))|~(segmentP(X3,X5))))&neq(X4,nil)))))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[97,theory(equality)])).
% fof(104, plain,![X1]:(~(ssList(X1))|![X2]:(~(ssList(X2))|((~(neq(X1,X2))|~(X1=X2))&(X1=X2|neq(X1,X2))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(105, plain,![X3]:(~(ssList(X3))|![X4]:(~(ssList(X4))|((~(neq(X3,X4))|~(X3=X4))&(X3=X4|neq(X3,X4))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[104])).
% fof(106, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(ssList(X4))|((~(neq(X3,X4))|~(X3=X4))&(X3=X4|neq(X3,X4))))|~(ssList(X3))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[105])).
% fof(107, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((((~(neq(X3,X4))|~(X3=X4))|~(ssList(X4)))|~(ssList(X3)))&(((X3=X4|neq(X3,X4))|~(ssList(X4)))|~(ssList(X3)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[106])).
% cnf(108,plain,(neq(X1,X2)|X1=X2|~ssList(X1)|~ssList(X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[107])).
% cnf(110,plain,(ssList(nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(125, plain,![X1]:(~(ssList(X1))|((~(segmentP(nil,X1))|nil=X1)&(~(nil=X1)|segmentP(nil,X1)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7])).
% fof(126, plain,![X2]:(~(ssList(X2))|((~(segmentP(nil,X2))|nil=X2)&(~(nil=X2)|segmentP(nil,X2)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[125])).
% fof(127, plain,![X2]:(((~(segmentP(nil,X2))|nil=X2)|~(ssList(X2)))&((~(nil=X2)|segmentP(nil,X2))|~(ssList(X2)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[126])).
% cnf(129,plain,(nil=X1|~ssList(X1)|~segmentP(nil,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[127])).
% fof(568, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:(ssList(X1)&?[X2]:(ssList(X2)&?[X3]:(ssList(X3)&?[X4]:(ssList(X4)&(((((X2=X4&X1=X3)&neq(X2,nil))&~(neq(X1,nil)))&(nil=X3|~(nil=X4)))&(?[X5]:(ssList(X5)&((neq(X5,nil)&segmentP(X4,X5))&segmentP(X3,X5)))|~(neq(X4,nil)))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[103])).
% fof(569, negated_conjecture,?[X6]:(ssList(X6)&?[X7]:(ssList(X7)&?[X8]:(ssList(X8)&?[X9]:(ssList(X9)&(((((X7=X9&X6=X8)&neq(X7,nil))&~(neq(X6,nil)))&(nil=X8|~(nil=X9)))&(?[X10]:(ssList(X10)&((neq(X10,nil)&segmentP(X9,X10))&segmentP(X8,X10)))|~(neq(X9,nil)))))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[568])).
% fof(570, negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk48_0)&(ssList(esk49_0)&(ssList(esk50_0)&(ssList(esk51_0)&(((((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&neq(esk49_0,nil))&~(neq(esk48_0,nil)))&(nil=esk50_0|~(nil=esk51_0)))&((ssList(esk52_0)&((neq(esk52_0,nil)&segmentP(esk51_0,esk52_0))&segmentP(esk50_0,esk52_0)))|~(neq(esk51_0,nil)))))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[569])).
% fof(571, negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk48_0)&(ssList(esk49_0)&(ssList(esk50_0)&(ssList(esk51_0)&(((((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&neq(esk49_0,nil))&~(neq(esk48_0,nil)))&(nil=esk50_0|~(nil=esk51_0)))&((ssList(esk52_0)|~(neq(esk51_0,nil)))&(((neq(esk52_0,nil)|~(neq(esk51_0,nil)))&(segmentP(esk51_0,esk52_0)|~(neq(esk51_0,nil))))&(segmentP(esk50_0,esk52_0)|~(neq(esk51_0,nil)))))))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[570])).
% cnf(572,negated_conjecture,(segmentP(esk50_0,esk52_0)|~neq(esk51_0,nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(574,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk52_0,nil)|~neq(esk51_0,nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(575,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk52_0)|~neq(esk51_0,nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(577,negated_conjecture,(~neq(esk48_0,nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(578,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk49_0,nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(579,negated_conjecture,(esk48_0=esk50_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(580,negated_conjecture,(esk49_0=esk51_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(584,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk48_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(585,negated_conjecture,(~neq(esk50_0,nil)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[577,579,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(586,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk50_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[584,579,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(590,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk51_0,nil)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[578,580,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(591,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk52_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[575,590,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(592,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk52_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[591,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(593,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk52_0,nil)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[574,590,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(594,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk52_0,nil)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[593,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(595,negated_conjecture,(segmentP(esk50_0,esk52_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[572,590,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(596,negated_conjecture,(segmentP(esk50_0,esk52_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[595,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(624,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0=nil|~ssList(nil)|~ssList(esk50_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[585,108,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(625,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0=nil|$false|~ssList(esk50_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[624,110,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(626,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0=nil|$false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[625,586,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(627,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0=nil),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[626,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1359,negated_conjecture,(segmentP(nil,esk52_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[596,627,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1360,negated_conjecture,(~neq(nil,nil)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[585,627,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1385,negated_conjecture,(nil=esk52_0|~ssList(esk52_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[129,1359,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1404,negated_conjecture,(nil=esk52_0|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1385,592,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1405,negated_conjecture,(nil=esk52_0),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1404,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1410,negated_conjecture,(neq(nil,nil)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[594,1405,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1411,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1410,1360,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1412,negated_conjecture,($false),1411,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 208
% # ...of these trivial                : 2
% # ...subsumed                        : 1
% # ...remaining for further processing: 205
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 69
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 10
% # Generated clauses                  : 565
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 468
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 2
% # Paramodulations                    : 474
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 91
% # Current number of processed clauses: 189
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 17
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 3
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 169
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 443
% # ...number of literals in the above : 3163
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 863
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 166
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 2
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 2
% # Backwards rewriting index:   226 leaves,   1.35+/-1.152 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:          100 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:          191 leaves,   1.25+/-0.996 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.064 s
% # System time            : 0.007 s
% # Total time             : 0.071 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.19 CPU 0.26 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.19 CPU 0.26 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25714/SWC206+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------