TSTP Solution File: SWC205+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SWC205+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:41:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.06s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named f590)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax15) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax17) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ( nil = X3
                      & nil != X2 )
                    | ( nil = X2
                      & nil != X3 )
                    | neq(X0,nil)
                    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ( nil = X3
                        & nil != X2 )
                      | ( nil = X2
                        & nil != X3 )
                      | neq(X0,nil)
                      | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( nil != X3
                    | nil = X2 )
                  & ( nil != X2
                    | nil = X3 )
                  & ~ neq(X0,nil)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( nil != X3
                    | nil = X2 )
                  & ( nil != X2
                    | nil = X3 )
                  & ~ neq(X0,nil)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f221]) ).

fof(f316,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 = X1 )
            & ( X0 != X1
              | ~ neq(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

fof(f343,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( nil != X3
                      | nil = X2 )
                    & ( nil != X2
                      | nil = X3 )
                    & ~ neq(X0,nil)
                    & neq(X1,nil)
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( nil != X3
                    | nil = X2 )
                  & ( nil != X2
                    | nil = X3 )
                  & ~ neq(sK53,nil)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & sK53 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK53) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f344,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( nil != X3
                  | nil = X2 )
                & ( nil != X2
                  | nil = X3 )
                & ~ neq(sK53,nil)
                & neq(X1,nil)
                & sK53 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( nil != X3
                | nil = X2 )
              & ( nil != X2
                | nil = X3 )
              & ~ neq(sK53,nil)
              & neq(sK54,nil)
              & sK53 = X2
              & sK54 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK54) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f345,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( nil != X3
              | nil = X2 )
            & ( nil != X2
              | nil = X3 )
            & ~ neq(sK53,nil)
            & neq(sK54,nil)
            & sK53 = X2
            & sK54 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( nil != X3
            | nil = sK55 )
          & ( nil != sK55
            | nil = X3 )
          & ~ neq(sK53,nil)
          & neq(sK54,nil)
          & sK53 = sK55
          & sK54 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK55) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f346,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( nil != X3
          | nil = sK55 )
        & ( nil != sK55
          | nil = X3 )
        & ~ neq(sK53,nil)
        & neq(sK54,nil)
        & sK53 = sK55
        & sK54 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ( nil != sK56
        | nil = sK55 )
      & ( nil != sK55
        | nil = sK56 )
      & ~ neq(sK53,nil)
      & neq(sK54,nil)
      & sK53 = sK55
      & sK54 = sK56
      & ssList(sK56) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f347,plain,
    ( ( nil != sK56
      | nil = sK55 )
    & ( nil != sK55
      | nil = sK56 )
    & ~ neq(sK53,nil)
    & neq(sK54,nil)
    & sK53 = sK55
    & sK54 = sK56
    & ssList(sK56)
    & ssList(sK55)
    & ssList(sK54)
    & ssList(sK53) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56])],[f222,f346,f345,f344,f343]) ).

fof(f438,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( neq(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f316]) ).

fof(f440,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f547,plain,
    ssList(sK53),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f551,plain,
    sK54 = sK56,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f552,plain,
    sK53 = sK55,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f553,plain,
    neq(sK54,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f554,plain,
    ~ neq(sK53,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f555,plain,
    ( nil != sK55
    | nil = sK56 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f557,plain,
    ~ neq(sK55,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f554,f552]) ).

fof(f558,plain,
    neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f553,f551]) ).

fof(f560,plain,
    ssList(sK55),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f547,f552]) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X0 = X1
    | neq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f438]) ).

cnf(c_139,plain,
    ( ~ neq(X0,X0)
    | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f590]) ).

cnf(c_141,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f440]) ).

cnf(c_247,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK55
    | nil = sK56 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f555]) ).

cnf(c_248,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(sK55,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f557]) ).

cnf(c_249,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f558]) ).

cnf(c_253,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK55),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f560]) ).

cnf(c_380,plain,
    ( nil != sK55
    | nil = sK56 ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_247]) ).

cnf(c_408,plain,
    ( ~ neq(X0,X0)
    | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_139]) ).

cnf(c_3672,plain,
    ( X0 != sK55
    | X1 != nil
    | ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_248]) ).

cnf(c_3673,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK55)
    | sK55 = nil ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3672]) ).

cnf(c_3674,plain,
    sK55 = nil,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3673,c_253,c_141,c_3673]) ).

cnf(c_3681,plain,
    ( X0 != nil
    | X0 != sK56
    | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_408,c_249]) ).

cnf(c_3682,plain,
    ( nil != sK56
    | ~ ssList(nil) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3681]) ).

cnf(c_3683,plain,
    nil != sK56,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3682,c_141,c_3682]) ).

cnf(c_3698,plain,
    nil != sK55,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_380,c_3683]) ).

cnf(c_6502,plain,
    nil != nil,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3698,c_3674]) ).

cnf(c_6503,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_6502]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWC205+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 18:27:22 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.06/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.06/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.06/1.19  
% 1.06/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.06/1.19  
% 1.06/1.19  ------  iProver source info
% 1.06/1.19  
% 1.06/1.19  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.06/1.19  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.06/1.19  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.06/1.19  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.06/1.19  
% 1.06/1.19  ------ Parsing...
% 1.06/1.19  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.06/1.19  
% 1.06/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e 
% 1.06/1.19  
% 1.06/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.06/1.19  
% 1.06/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.06/1.19  
% 1.06/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------