TSTP Solution File: SWC205+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWC205+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:42:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 68 ( 28 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 74 ( 27 ~; 22 |; 14 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn; 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| neq(X1,nil)
| ( nil != X4
& nil = X3 )
| ( nil != X3
& nil = X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SbndBMTX1z/E---3.1_13400.p',co1) ).
fof(ax15,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( neq(X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SbndBMTX1z/E---3.1_13400.p',ax15) ).
fof(ax17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SbndBMTX1z/E---3.1_13400.p',ax17) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| neq(X1,nil)
| ( nil != X4
& nil = X3 )
| ( nil != X3
& nil = X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& neq(esk2_0,nil)
& ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
& ( nil = esk4_0
| nil != esk3_0 )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| nil != esk4_0 ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(esk1_0,nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( ( ~ neq(X18,X19)
| X18 != X19
| ~ ssList(X19)
| ~ ssList(X18) )
& ( X18 = X19
| neq(X18,X19)
| ~ ssList(X19)
| ~ ssList(X18) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax15])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(esk3_0,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = X2
| neq(X1,X2)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk3_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk2_0,nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk4_0
| nil != esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 = nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk4_0,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 = nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(nil,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC205+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:21:22 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SbndBMTX1z/E---3.1_13400.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # new_bool_1 with pid 13511 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with pid 13515 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 77
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 37
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 37
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 75
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 72
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 19
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 13
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 33
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 51
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 44
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 213
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 83
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3654
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1968 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------