TSTP Solution File: SWC199-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC199-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:59:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.92s 1.15s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SWC199-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 01:47:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.44 The process was started by sandbox2 on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.44 Sun Jun 12 01:47:07 2022
% 0.19/0.44 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 22250.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.44 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.44 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.44 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.44 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.44 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.44 140 back subsumes 139.
% 0.19/0.44 150 back subsumes 144.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 438 during input processing: 0 [copy,438,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 345.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 285.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 284.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 283.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 273.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 260.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 259.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 258.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 217.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 205.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 204.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 203.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 202.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 185.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 182.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 180.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 176.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 173.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 150.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 149.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 148.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 147.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 146.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 138.
% 0.19/0.44 438 back subsumes 137.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.50 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.50 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.50 number of clauses in intial UL: 337
% 0.19/0.50 number of clauses initially in problem: 401
% 0.19/0.50 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.19/0.50 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 95
% 0.19/0.50 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.50 absolute distinct symbol count: 74
% 0.19/0.50 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.19/0.50 distinct function count: 47
% 0.19/0.50 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.92/1.15 cons(skac3,app(nil,nil))=app(cons(skac3,nil),nil).
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.92/1.15 42 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1341.2 K.
% 0.92/1.15 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.92/1.15 sym_ent ( 304) 185 0 185 0 54.9 K
% 0.92/1.15 term ( 32) 83842 77729 6113 12 191.4 K
% 0.92/1.15 rel ( 40) 60124 53519 6605 10 258.4 K
% 0.92/1.15 term_ptr ( 16) 26102 3206 22896 20 358.1 K
% 0.92/1.15 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 fpa_head ( 24) 1938 66 1872 8 44.1 K
% 0.92/1.15 fpa_tree ( 56) 9333 9333 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.92/1.15 context (1288) 16790 16790 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.92/1.15 trail ( 24) 194429 194429 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.92/1.15 imd_tree ( 32) 27 5 22 5 0.8 K
% 0.92/1.15 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 is_tree ( 24) 1339 107 1232 11 29.1 K
% 0.92/1.15 is_pos (2424) 68794 68794 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.92/1.15 fsub_pos ( 16) 9848 9848 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 literal ( 32) 20518 16295 4223 2 132.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 clause ( 88) 3773 2773 1000 1 86.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.92/1.15 clash_nd ( 80) 4754 4754 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.92/1.15 clause_ptr ( 16) 915 88 827 3 13.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 int_ptr ( 16) 8820 4247 4573 5 71.5 K
% 0.92/1.15 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.92/1.15 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.92/1.15 ep time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 sort lits time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 forward subsume 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 hints time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 conflict time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 new demod time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 post_process time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 back demod time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 back subsume 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 factor time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15 unindex time 0.00
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 true clauses given 1 (11.1%)
% 0.92/1.15 false clauses given 8
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 FALSE TRUE
% 0.92/1.15 2 3 0
% 0.92/1.15 3 33 9
% 0.92/1.15 4 6 8
% 0.92/1.15 7 0 41
% 0.92/1.15 9 0 15
% 0.92/1.15 10 0 2
% 0.92/1.15 11 0 63
% 0.92/1.15 12 0 24
% 0.92/1.15 13 0 39
% 0.92/1.15 14 0 12
% 0.92/1.15 15 0 31
% 0.92/1.15 16 0 19
% 0.92/1.15 17 0 15
% 0.92/1.15 19 0 7
% 0.92/1.15 21 0 21
% 0.92/1.15 22 0 15
% 0.92/1.15 23 0 7
% 0.92/1.15 24 0 1
% 0.92/1.15 26 0 3
% 0.92/1.15 28 0 1
% 0.92/1.15 tot: 42 333 (88.8% true)
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.92/1.15 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.92/1.15 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.92/1.15 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.92/1.15 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.92/1.15 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.92/1.15 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.92/1.15 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.92/1.15 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.92/1.15 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.92/1.15 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.92/1.15 All others: 651.
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.92/1.15
% 0.92/1.15 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------