TSTP Solution File: SWC198-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWC198-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:39:50 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 9 unt; 9 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 58 ( 19 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause161,axiom,
( memberP(X2,X3)
| X3 = X1
| ~ memberP(cons(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p',clause161) ).
cnf(co1_15,negated_conjecture,
( cons(sk6,nil) = sk3
| nil = sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p',co1_15) ).
cnf(clause8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p',clause8) ).
cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk6)
| nil = sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p',co1_11) ).
cnf(clause71,axiom,
( ~ memberP(nil,X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p',clause71) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(sk1,sk5(X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5(X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| X1 != sk5(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(clause9,axiom,
ssItem(skac3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p',clause9) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( memberP(X2,X3)
| X3 = X1
| ~ memberP(cons(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X3) ),
clause161 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( cons(sk6,nil) = sk3
| nil = sk3 ),
co1_15 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
ssList(nil),
clause8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk6)
| nil = sk3 ),
co1_11 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( ~ memberP(nil,X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
clause71 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(sk1,sk5(X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
co1_8 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( sk3 = nil
| sk6 = X1
| ~ memberP(sk3,X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(sk3,sk5(X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5(X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( sk5(X1) = sk6
| sk3 = nil
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| X1 != sk5(X1) ),
co1_9 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( sk5(sk6) = sk6
| sk3 = nil ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
sk3 = nil,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(nil,sk5(X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
ssItem(skac3),
clause9 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ ssItem(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_24]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWC198-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:19:07 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fj3rOiToSP/E---3.1_21985.p
% 0.17/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 22063 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.17/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.53 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.53 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2s with 406s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 22072 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.17/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.53 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.53 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2s with 406s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.53
% 0.17/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.53 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 202
% 0.17/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Initial clauses : 202
% 0.17/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 202
% 0.17/0.53 # Processed clauses : 466
% 0.17/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.17/0.53 # ...subsumed : 93
% 0.17/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 361
% 0.17/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 31
% 0.17/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 83
% 0.17/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 99
% 0.17/0.53 # Generated clauses : 2257
% 0.17/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2118
% 0.17/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 62
% 0.17/0.53 # Paramodulations : 2119
% 0.17/0.53 # Factorizations : 39
% 0.17/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 61
% 0.17/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 980
% 0.17/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 136
% 0.17/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 39
% 0.17/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 94
% 0.17/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1775
% 0.17/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 8203
% 0.17/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 220
% 0.17/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13713
% 0.17/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1789
% 0.17/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 157
% 0.17/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 205
% 0.17/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.17/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.17/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 42139
% 0.17/0.53
% 0.17/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.53 # User time : 0.062 s
% 0.17/0.53 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.53 # Total time : 0.072 s
% 0.17/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 2112 pages
% 0.17/0.53
% 0.17/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.53 # User time : 0.321 s
% 0.17/0.53 # System time : 0.033 s
% 0.17/0.53 # Total time : 0.354 s
% 0.17/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1852 pages
% 0.17/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------