TSTP Solution File: SWC193-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC193-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:59:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.67s 0.84s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC193-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 16:23:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.43 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.43 The process was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.43 Sun Jun 12 16:23:39 2022
% 0.19/0.43 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 17460.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.43 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.43 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.43 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.43 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.43 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.43 138 back subsumes 137.
% 0.19/0.43 148 back subsumes 142.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 435 during input processing: 0 [copy,435,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 335.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 279.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 278.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 277.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 267.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 254.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 253.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 252.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 215.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 203.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 202.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 201.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 200.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 183.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 180.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 178.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 174.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 171.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 148.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 147.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 146.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 145.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 144.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 136.
% 0.19/0.43 435 back subsumes 135.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.49 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.49 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.49 number of clauses in intial UL: 335
% 0.19/0.49 number of clauses initially in problem: 402
% 0.19/0.49 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.19/0.49 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 0.19/0.49 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.49 absolute distinct symbol count: 77
% 0.19/0.49 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.19/0.49 distinct function count: 46
% 0.19/0.49 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.67/0.84 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.67/0.84 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.67/0.84 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 Model 2 [ 1 1 2182 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 true clauses given 1 (50.0%)
% 0.67/0.84 false clauses given 1
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 FALSE TRUE
% 0.67/0.84 2 11 3
% 0.67/0.84 3 40 3
% 0.67/0.84 4 7 0
% 0.67/0.84 5 1 1
% 0.67/0.84 7 0 6
% 0.67/0.84 9 0 5
% 0.67/0.84 11 0 10
% 0.67/0.84 12 0 8
% 0.67/0.84 13 1 5
% 0.67/0.84 14 0 2
% 0.67/0.84 15 0 6
% 0.67/0.84 16 0 4
% 0.67/0.84 17 0 4
% 0.67/0.84 19 0 2
% 0.67/0.84 21 0 6
% 0.67/0.84 22 0 2
% 0.67/0.84 23 0 2
% 0.67/0.84 tot: 60 69 (53.5% true)
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 Model 2 [ 1 1 2182 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.67/0.84 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.67/0.84 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.67/0.84 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 The job finished Sun Jun 12 16:23:39 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------