TSTP Solution File: SWC189+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWC189+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:14:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.48s 2.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (  12 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_197,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = X2
    | app(app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),cons(X2,nil)),X4) != esk50_0
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-36rdxgyi/lgb.p',i_0_197) ).

cnf(i_0_198,negated_conjecture,
    esk50_0 = esk48_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-36rdxgyi/lgb.p',i_0_198) ).

cnf(i_0_192,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(app(esk54_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)),cons(esk53_0,nil)),esk55_0) = esk48_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-36rdxgyi/lgb.p',i_0_192) ).

cnf(i_0_195,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk53_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-36rdxgyi/lgb.p',i_0_195) ).

cnf(i_0_196,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk52_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-36rdxgyi/lgb.p',i_0_196) ).

cnf(i_0_193,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk55_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-36rdxgyi/lgb.p',i_0_193) ).

cnf(i_0_194,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk54_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-36rdxgyi/lgb.p',i_0_194) ).

cnf(i_0_191,negated_conjecture,
    esk53_0 != esk52_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-36rdxgyi/lgb.p',i_0_191) ).

cnf(c_0_207,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = X2
    | app(app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),cons(X2,nil)),X4) != esk50_0
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    i_0_197 ).

cnf(c_0_208,negated_conjecture,
    esk50_0 = esk48_0,
    i_0_198 ).

cnf(c_0_209,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = X2
    | app(app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),cons(X2,nil)),X4) != esk48_0
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_207,c_0_208]) ).

cnf(c_0_210,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(app(esk54_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)),cons(esk53_0,nil)),esk55_0) = esk48_0,
    i_0_192 ).

cnf(c_0_211,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk53_0),
    i_0_195 ).

cnf(c_0_212,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk52_0),
    i_0_196 ).

cnf(c_0_213,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk55_0),
    i_0_193 ).

cnf(c_0_214,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk54_0),
    i_0_194 ).

cnf(c_0_215,negated_conjecture,
    esk53_0 != esk52_0,
    i_0_191 ).

cnf(c_0_216,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_209,c_0_210]),c_0_211]),c_0_212]),c_0_213]),c_0_214])]),c_0_215]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWC189+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 14:26:55 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.48  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.48/2.67  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.48/2.67  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.48/2.67  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.48/2.67  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.48/2.67  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.48/2.67  #
% 7.48/2.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 7.48/2.67  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.48/2.67  
% 7.48/2.67  # Proof found!
% 7.48/2.67  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.48/2.67  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.48/2.67  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.48/2.67  
% 7.48/2.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.48/2.67  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 7.48/2.67  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.48/2.67  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 7.48/2.67  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.48/2.67  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------