TSTP Solution File: SWC187-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC187-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:59:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.90s 1.12s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SWC187-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 21:46:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.44 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.44 The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.44 Sun Jun 12 21:46:37 2022
% 0.21/0.44 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 4619.
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.44 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.44 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 list(usable).
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.44 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.44 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.44 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.21/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.21/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.21/0.44 135 back subsumes 134.
% 0.21/0.44 145 back subsumes 139.
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 442 during input processing: 0 [copy,442,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 332.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 276.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 275.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 274.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 264.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 251.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 250.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 249.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 212.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 200.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 199.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 198.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 197.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 180.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 177.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 175.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 171.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 168.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 145.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 144.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 143.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 142.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 141.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 133.
% 0.21/0.44 442 back subsumes 132.
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.51 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.51 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.51 number of clauses in intial UL: 334
% 0.21/0.51 number of clauses initially in problem: 405
% 0.21/0.51 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 82
% 0.21/0.51 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 89
% 0.21/0.51 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.51 absolute distinct symbol count: 77
% 0.21/0.51 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.21/0.51 distinct function count: 46
% 0.21/0.51 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.90/1.11 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.90/1.11 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.90/1.11 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Model 2 [ 1 1 384 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 true clauses given 2 (33.3%)
% 0.90/1.11 false clauses given 4
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 FALSE TRUE
% 0.90/1.11 2 7 2
% 0.90/1.11 3 39 3
% 0.90/1.11 4 7 0
% 0.90/1.11 5 1 2
% 0.90/1.11 6 3 0
% 0.90/1.11 7 0 29
% 0.90/1.11 8 0 2
% 0.90/1.11 9 0 22
% 0.90/1.11 10 0 2
% 0.90/1.11 11 1 43
% 0.90/1.11 12 0 18
% 0.90/1.11 13 0 25
% 0.90/1.11 14 0 8
% 0.90/1.11 15 0 22
% 0.90/1.11 16 0 14
% 0.90/1.11 17 0 12
% 0.90/1.11 19 0 6
% 0.90/1.11 21 0 18
% 0.90/1.11 22 0 10
% 0.90/1.11 23 0 6
% 0.90/1.11 tot: 58 244 (80.8% true)
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Model 2 [ 1 1 384 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.90/1.11 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.90/1.11 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.90/1.11 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 The job finished Sun Jun 12 21:46:38 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------