TSTP Solution File: SWC185+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWC185+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:14:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.83s 2.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 14 unt; 2 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 9 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_192,negated_conjecture,
app(app(esk53_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)),esk54_0) = esk48_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gyrpg7gl/lgb.p',i_0_192) ).
cnf(i_0_198,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk48_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gyrpg7gl/lgb.p',i_0_198) ).
cnf(i_0_196,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(X1,cons(X2,nil)),X3) != esk50_0
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ memberP(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gyrpg7gl/lgb.p',i_0_196) ).
cnf(i_0_195,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(esk52_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gyrpg7gl/lgb.p',i_0_195) ).
cnf(i_0_193,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk54_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gyrpg7gl/lgb.p',i_0_193) ).
cnf(i_0_194,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk53_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gyrpg7gl/lgb.p',i_0_194) ).
cnf(i_0_191,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(esk53_0,esk52_0)
| memberP(esk54_0,esk52_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gyrpg7gl/lgb.p',i_0_191) ).
cnf(i_0_197,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(X1,cons(X2,nil)),X3) != esk50_0
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gyrpg7gl/lgb.p',i_0_197) ).
cnf(c_0_207,negated_conjecture,
app(app(esk53_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)),esk54_0) = esk48_0,
i_0_192 ).
cnf(c_0_208,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk48_0,
i_0_198 ).
cnf(c_0_209,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(X1,cons(X2,nil)),X3) != esk50_0
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ memberP(X3,X2) ),
i_0_196 ).
cnf(c_0_210,negated_conjecture,
app(app(esk53_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)),esk54_0) = esk50_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_207,c_0_208]) ).
cnf(c_0_211,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(esk52_0),
i_0_195 ).
cnf(c_0_212,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk54_0),
i_0_193 ).
cnf(c_0_213,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk53_0),
i_0_194 ).
cnf(c_0_214,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(esk53_0,esk52_0)
| memberP(esk54_0,esk52_0) ),
i_0_191 ).
cnf(c_0_215,negated_conjecture,
~ memberP(esk54_0,esk52_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_209,c_0_210]),c_0_211]),c_0_212]),c_0_213])]) ).
cnf(c_0_216,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(X1,cons(X2,nil)),X3) != esk50_0
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
i_0_197 ).
cnf(c_0_217,negated_conjecture,
memberP(esk53_0,esk52_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_214,c_0_215]) ).
cnf(c_0_218,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_216,c_0_210]),c_0_211]),c_0_212]),c_0_213]),c_0_217])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SWC185+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 22:20:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.83/2.33 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.83/2.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.83/2.33 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.83/2.33 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 6.83/2.33 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 6.83/2.33 #
% 6.83/2.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 6.83/2.33 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.83/2.33
% 6.83/2.33 # Proof found!
% 6.83/2.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.83/2.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.83/2.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.83/2.33
% 6.83/2.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.83/2.33 # User time : 0.016 s
% 6.83/2.33 # System time : 0.003 s
% 6.83/2.33 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 6.83/2.33 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 6.83/2.33
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------