TSTP Solution File: SWC179-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWC179-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:41:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 14 unt; 4 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 7 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ofKZtiIkXv/E---3.1_16091.p',co1_1) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ofKZtiIkXv/E---3.1_16091.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
~ duplicatefreeP(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ofKZtiIkXv/E---3.1_16091.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(clause72,axiom,
( duplicatefreeP(X1)
| ssItem(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ofKZtiIkXv/E---3.1_16091.p',clause72) ).
cnf(clause65,axiom,
( duplicatefreeP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ofKZtiIkXv/E---3.1_16091.p',clause65) ).
cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
( cons(sk5,nil) = sk3
| nil = sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ofKZtiIkXv/E---3.1_16091.p',co1_18) ).
cnf(clause2,axiom,
duplicatefreeP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ofKZtiIkXv/E---3.1_16091.p',clause2) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
co1_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ duplicatefreeP(sk1),
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( duplicatefreeP(X1)
| ssItem(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
clause72 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ duplicatefreeP(sk3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( duplicatefreeP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
clause65 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
duplicatefreeP(cons(X1,nil)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( cons(sk5,nil) = sk3
| nil = sk3 ),
co1_18 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
sk3 = nil,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
duplicatefreeP(nil),
clause2 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.07 % Problem : SWC179-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.02/0.08 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.07/0.27 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.27 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.07/0.27 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.27 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 01:54:59 EDT 2023
% 0.07/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.35 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ofKZtiIkXv/E---3.1_16091.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.12/0.36 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.36 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.36 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.36 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36 # new_bool_3 with pid 16195 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.12/0.36 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.36 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.36 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.36 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.36 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.36 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.36 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.36 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 16198 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.36 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.36 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.36 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.36 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.36 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.36 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.36 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.36 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.36 # Parsed axioms : 206
% 0.12/0.36 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 145
% 0.12/0.36 # Initial clauses : 61
% 0.12/0.36 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Initial clauses in saturation : 61
% 0.12/0.36 # Processed clauses : 101
% 0.12/0.36 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.12/0.36 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.12/0.36 # ...remaining for further processing : 96
% 0.12/0.36 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.12/0.36 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Backward-rewritten : 20
% 0.12/0.36 # Generated clauses : 20
% 0.12/0.36 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23
% 0.12/0.36 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.12/0.36 # Paramodulations : 15
% 0.12/0.36 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.12/0.36 # Total rewrite steps : 38
% 0.12/0.36 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.36 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.12/0.36 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.12/0.36 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.12/0.36 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 38
% 0.12/0.36 # ...number of literals in the above : 148
% 0.12/0.36 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Current number of archived clauses : 77
% 0.12/0.36 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 357
% 0.12/0.36 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66
% 0.12/0.36 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.12/0.36 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.12/0.36 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.12/0.36 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.12/0.36 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.36 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3424
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.36 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.12/0.36 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.36 # Maximum resident set size: 1980 pages
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.12/0.36 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.36 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.36 # Maximum resident set size: 1856 pages
% 0.12/0.36 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------