TSTP Solution File: SWC179+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SWC179+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 07:17:20 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.30s
% Output   : Solution 1.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21533/SWC179+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21533/SWC179+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21533/SWC179+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 21629
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.032 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(18, axiom,![X1]:(ssItem(X1)=>duplicatefreeP(cons(X1,nil))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax71)).
% fof(19, axiom,duplicatefreeP(nil),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax72)).
% fof(96, conjecture,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|duplicatefreeP(X1))|(![X5]:(ssItem(X5)=>![X6]:(ssList(X6)=>![X7]:(ssList(X7)=>(((~(cons(X5,nil)=X3)|~(app(app(X6,X3),X7)=X4))|?[X8]:((ssItem(X8)&memberP(X6,X8))<(X5,X8)))|?[X9]:((ssItem(X9)&memberP(X7,X9))<(X9,X5))))))&(~(nil=X4)|~(nil=X3)))))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', co1)).
% fof(97, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|duplicatefreeP(X1))|(![X5]:(ssItem(X5)=>![X6]:(ssList(X6)=>![X7]:(ssList(X7)=>(((~(cons(X5,nil)=X3)|~(app(app(X6,X3),X7)=X4))|?[X8]:((ssItem(X8)&memberP(X6,X8))<(X5,X8)))|?[X9]:((ssItem(X9)&memberP(X7,X9))<(X9,X5))))))&(~(nil=X4)|~(nil=X3))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[96])).
% fof(192, plain,![X1]:(~(ssItem(X1))|duplicatefreeP(cons(X1,nil))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(193, plain,![X2]:(~(ssItem(X2))|duplicatefreeP(cons(X2,nil))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[192])).
% cnf(194,plain,(duplicatefreeP(cons(X1,nil))|~ssItem(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[193])).
% cnf(195,plain,(duplicatefreeP(nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[19])).
% fof(567, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:(ssList(X1)&?[X2]:(ssList(X2)&?[X3]:(ssList(X3)&?[X4]:(ssList(X4)&(((X2=X4&X1=X3)&~(duplicatefreeP(X1)))&(?[X5]:(ssItem(X5)&?[X6]:(ssList(X6)&?[X7]:(ssList(X7)&(((cons(X5,nil)=X3&app(app(X6,X3),X7)=X4)&![X8]:((~(ssItem(X8))|~(memberP(X6,X8)))|~(lt(X5,X8))))&![X9]:((~(ssItem(X9))|~(memberP(X7,X9)))|~(lt(X9,X5)))))))|(nil=X4&nil=X3))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[97])).
% fof(568, negated_conjecture,?[X10]:(ssList(X10)&?[X11]:(ssList(X11)&?[X12]:(ssList(X12)&?[X13]:(ssList(X13)&(((X11=X13&X10=X12)&~(duplicatefreeP(X10)))&(?[X14]:(ssItem(X14)&?[X15]:(ssList(X15)&?[X16]:(ssList(X16)&(((cons(X14,nil)=X12&app(app(X15,X12),X16)=X13)&![X17]:((~(ssItem(X17))|~(memberP(X15,X17)))|~(lt(X14,X17))))&![X18]:((~(ssItem(X18))|~(memberP(X16,X18)))|~(lt(X18,X14)))))))|(nil=X13&nil=X12))))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[567])).
% fof(569, negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk48_0)&(ssList(esk49_0)&(ssList(esk50_0)&(ssList(esk51_0)&(((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&~(duplicatefreeP(esk48_0)))&((ssItem(esk52_0)&(ssList(esk53_0)&(ssList(esk54_0)&(((cons(esk52_0,nil)=esk50_0&app(app(esk53_0,esk50_0),esk54_0)=esk51_0)&![X17]:((~(ssItem(X17))|~(memberP(esk53_0,X17)))|~(lt(esk52_0,X17))))&![X18]:((~(ssItem(X18))|~(memberP(esk54_0,X18)))|~(lt(X18,esk52_0)))))))|(nil=esk51_0&nil=esk50_0))))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[568])).
% fof(570, negated_conjecture,![X17]:![X18]:((((((((((((~(ssItem(X18))|~(memberP(esk54_0,X18)))|~(lt(X18,esk52_0)))&(((~(ssItem(X17))|~(memberP(esk53_0,X17)))|~(lt(esk52_0,X17)))&(cons(esk52_0,nil)=esk50_0&app(app(esk53_0,esk50_0),esk54_0)=esk51_0)))&ssList(esk54_0))&ssList(esk53_0))&ssItem(esk52_0))|(nil=esk51_0&nil=esk50_0))&((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&~(duplicatefreeP(esk48_0))))&ssList(esk51_0))&ssList(esk50_0))&ssList(esk49_0))&ssList(esk48_0)),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[569])).
% fof(571, negated_conjecture,![X17]:![X18]:(((((((((((nil=esk51_0|((~(ssItem(X18))|~(memberP(esk54_0,X18)))|~(lt(X18,esk52_0))))&(nil=esk50_0|((~(ssItem(X18))|~(memberP(esk54_0,X18)))|~(lt(X18,esk52_0)))))&(((nil=esk51_0|((~(ssItem(X17))|~(memberP(esk53_0,X17)))|~(lt(esk52_0,X17))))&(nil=esk50_0|((~(ssItem(X17))|~(memberP(esk53_0,X17)))|~(lt(esk52_0,X17)))))&(((nil=esk51_0|cons(esk52_0,nil)=esk50_0)&(nil=esk50_0|cons(esk52_0,nil)=esk50_0))&((nil=esk51_0|app(app(esk53_0,esk50_0),esk54_0)=esk51_0)&(nil=esk50_0|app(app(esk53_0,esk50_0),esk54_0)=esk51_0)))))&((nil=esk51_0|ssList(esk54_0))&(nil=esk50_0|ssList(esk54_0))))&((nil=esk51_0|ssList(esk53_0))&(nil=esk50_0|ssList(esk53_0))))&((nil=esk51_0|ssItem(esk52_0))&(nil=esk50_0|ssItem(esk52_0))))&((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&~(duplicatefreeP(esk48_0))))&ssList(esk51_0))&ssList(esk50_0))&ssList(esk49_0))&ssList(esk48_0)),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[570])).
% cnf(576,negated_conjecture,(~duplicatefreeP(esk48_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(577,negated_conjecture,(esk48_0=esk50_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(579,negated_conjecture,(ssItem(esk52_0)|nil=esk50_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(587,negated_conjecture,(cons(esk52_0,nil)=esk50_0|nil=esk50_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(593,negated_conjecture,(~duplicatefreeP(esk50_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[576,577,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(598,negated_conjecture,(duplicatefreeP(esk50_0)|esk50_0=nil|~ssItem(esk52_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[194,587,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(600,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0=nil|~ssItem(esk52_0)),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[598,593,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1531,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0=nil),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[600,579])).
% cnf(1540,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[593,1531,theory(equality)]),195,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1541,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1540,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1542,negated_conjecture,($false),1541,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 210
% # ...of these trivial                : 2
% # ...subsumed                        : 1
% # ...remaining for further processing: 207
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 69
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 12
% # Generated clauses                  : 643
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 536
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 3
% # Paramodulations                    : 552
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 91
% # Current number of processed clauses: 189
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 13
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 2
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 174
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 440
% # ...number of literals in the above : 3159
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1073
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 186
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index:   231 leaves,   1.35+/-1.140 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           99 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:          194 leaves,   1.24+/-0.987 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.070 s
% # System time            : 0.005 s
% # Total time             : 0.075 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.20 CPU 0.29 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.20 CPU 0.29 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21533/SWC179+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------