TSTP Solution File: SWC179+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWC179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:02:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.86s 1.07s
% Output   : Refutation 0.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWC179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:20:21 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.86/1.07  
% 0.86/1.07  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.86/1.07  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.86/1.07  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.86/1.07  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.86/1.07  SPASS derived 1306 clauses, backtracked 765 clauses, performed 24 splits and kept 1780 clauses.
% 0.86/1.07  SPASS allocated 99203 KBytes.
% 0.86/1.07  SPASS spent	0:00:00.72 on the problem.
% 0.86/1.07  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.86/1.07  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.86/1.07  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.86/1.07  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.86/1.07  		0:00:00.44 for the reduction.
% 0.86/1.07  
% 0.86/1.07  
% 0.86/1.07  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 38 :
% 0.86/1.07  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.86/1.07  1[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc5)*.
% 0.86/1.07  2[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc4)*.
% 0.86/1.07  11[0:Inp] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(nil)*.
% 0.86/1.07  13[0:Inp] || duplicatefreeP(skc4)* -> .
% 0.86/1.07  54[0:Inp] ||  -> ssItem(skf46(u,v))*.
% 0.86/1.07  70[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> equal(nil,skc5).
% 0.86/1.07  71[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> equal(nil,skc4).
% 0.86/1.07  78[0:Inp] ssItem(u) ||  -> duplicatefreeP(cons(u,nil))*.
% 0.86/1.07  87[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(u,v) equal(cons(skf46(u,v),nil),v)**.
% 0.86/1.07  190[0:Inp] ssList(u) ssList(v) || equal(tl(u),tl(v))* equal(hd(u),hd(v)) -> equal(u,v) equal(nil,v) equal(nil,u).
% 0.86/1.07  199[0:Rew:71.1,70.1] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> equal(skc5,skc4).
% 0.86/1.07  288[0:Res:2.0,190.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc4),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc4,u) equal(nil,skc4).
% 0.86/1.07  459[0:Res:1.0,190.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u) equal(nil,skc5).
% 0.86/1.07  561[1:Spt:459.5] ||  -> equal(nil,skc5)**.
% 0.86/1.07  563[1:Rew:561.0,78.1] ssItem(u) ||  -> duplicatefreeP(cons(u,skc5))*.
% 0.86/1.07  635[1:Rew:561.0,11.0] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(skc5)*.
% 0.86/1.07  663[1:Rew:561.0,87.1] ||  -> SkP0(u,v) equal(cons(skf46(u,v),skc5),v)**.
% 0.86/1.07  762[2:Spt:199.1] ||  -> equal(skc5,skc4)**.
% 0.86/1.07  864[2:Rew:762.0,635.0] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(skc4)*.
% 0.86/1.07  913[2:MRR:864.0,13.0] ||  -> .
% 0.86/1.07  1013[2:Spt:913.0,199.1,762.0] || equal(skc5,skc4)** -> .
% 0.86/1.07  1014[2:Spt:913.0,199.0] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> .
% 0.86/1.07  1390[1:SpR:663.1,563.1] ssItem(skf46(u,v)) ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* duplicatefreeP(v).
% 0.86/1.07  1404[1:SSi:1390.0,54.0] ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* duplicatefreeP(v).
% 0.86/1.07  1439[2:Res:1404.0,1014.0] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(skc4)*.
% 0.86/1.07  1440[2:MRR:1439.0,13.0] ||  -> .
% 0.86/1.07  1441[1:Spt:1440.0,459.5,561.0] || equal(nil,skc5)** -> .
% 0.86/1.07  1442[1:Spt:1440.0,459.0,459.1,459.2,459.3,459.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u).
% 0.86/1.07  1466[2:Spt:288.5] ||  -> equal(nil,skc4)**.
% 0.86/1.07  1474[2:Rew:1466.0,11.0] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(skc4)*.
% 0.86/1.07  1561[2:MRR:1474.0,13.0] ||  -> .
% 0.86/1.07  1639[2:Spt:1561.0,288.5,1466.0] || equal(nil,skc4)** -> .
% 0.86/1.07  1640[2:Spt:1561.0,288.0,288.1,288.2,288.3,288.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc4),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc4,u).
% 0.86/1.07  1646[2:MRR:71.1,1639.0] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> .
% 0.86/1.07  1762[0:SpR:87.1,78.1] ssItem(skf46(u,v)) ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* duplicatefreeP(v).
% 0.86/1.07  1770[0:SSi:1762.0,54.0] ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* duplicatefreeP(v).
% 0.86/1.07  1779[2:Res:1770.0,1646.0] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(skc4)*.
% 0.86/1.07  1780[2:MRR:1779.0,13.0] ||  -> .
% 0.86/1.07  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.86/1.07  Formulae used in the proof : co1 ax2 ax17 ax72 ax71 ax77
% 0.86/1.07  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------