TSTP Solution File: SWC179+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWC179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:27:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 103 ( 40 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 43 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 116 ( 29 ~; 42 |; 30 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 15 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 27 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 sgn 18 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| duplicatefreeP(X1)
| ( ! [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
=> ! [X6] :
( ssList(X6)
=> ! [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
=> ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
| app(app(X6,X3),X7) != X4
| ? [X8] :
( ssItem(X8)
& memberP(X6,X8)
& lt(X5,X8) )
| ? [X9] :
( ssItem(X9)
& memberP(X7,X9)
& lt(X9,X5) ) ) ) ) )
& ( nil != X4
| nil != X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co1) ).
fof(ax71,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssItem(X1)
=> duplicatefreeP(cons(X1,nil)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax71) ).
fof(ax72,axiom,
duplicatefreeP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax72) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| duplicatefreeP(X1)
| ( ! [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
=> ! [X6] :
( ssList(X6)
=> ! [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
=> ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
| app(app(X6,X3),X7) != X4
| ? [X8] :
( ssItem(X8)
& memberP(X6,X8)
& lt(X5,X8) )
| ? [X9] :
( ssItem(X9)
& memberP(X7,X9)
& lt(X9,X5) ) ) ) ) )
& ( nil != X4
| nil != X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X17,X18] :
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& ~ duplicatefreeP(esk1_0)
& ( nil = esk4_0
| ssItem(esk5_0) )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| ssItem(esk5_0) )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| ssList(esk6_0) )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| ssList(esk6_0) )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| ssList(esk7_0) )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| ssList(esk7_0) )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0 )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0 )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| app(app(esk6_0,esk3_0),esk7_0) = esk4_0 )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| app(app(esk6_0,esk3_0),esk7_0) = esk4_0 )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| ~ ssItem(X17)
| ~ memberP(esk6_0,X17)
| ~ lt(esk5_0,X17) )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| ~ ssItem(X17)
| ~ memberP(esk6_0,X17)
| ~ lt(esk5_0,X17) )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| ~ ssItem(X18)
| ~ memberP(esk7_0,X18)
| ~ lt(X18,esk5_0) )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| ~ ssItem(X18)
| ~ memberP(esk7_0,X18)
| ~ lt(X18,esk5_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ ssItem(X2)
| duplicatefreeP(cons(X2,nil)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax71])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0
| nil = esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk5_0)
| nil = esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( duplicatefreeP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk1_0
| nil = esk1_0 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ duplicatefreeP(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk1_0
| ssItem(esk5_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
duplicatefreeP(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax72]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
nil = esk1_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SWC179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:06:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object total steps : 16
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object clause steps : 10
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 0.22/1.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 63
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses : 76
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 76
% 0.22/1.40 # Processed clauses : 77
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.22/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 74
% 0.22/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.22/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 28
% 0.22/1.40 # Generated clauses : 206
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 186
% 0.22/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.22/1.40 # Paramodulations : 196
% 0.22/1.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 10
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 43
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 34
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 68
% 0.22/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 380
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 28
% 0.22/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 567
% 0.22/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 211
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9334
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40 # User time : 0.034 s
% 0.22/1.40 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Total time : 0.036 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 3464 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------