TSTP Solution File: SWC146+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWC146+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:59:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWC146+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 07:07:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.51  The process was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.51  Sun Jun 12 07:07:29 2022
% 0.20/0.51  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 25265.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.51  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.51  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.51  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.51  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.51  clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.51     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.51    Following clause subsumed by 177 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssItem(A)| -ssItem(B)|lt(A,B)|A=B| -leq(A,B).
% 0.20/0.51  302 back subsumes 258.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.14 sec ----> 453 [binary,452.1,182.1] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Length of proof is 1.  Level of proof is 1.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  182 [] {-} -neq($c3,nil).
% 0.20/0.51  448,447 [] {-} $c5=$c3.
% 0.20/0.51  451 [] {-} neq($c5,nil).
% 0.20/0.51  452 [copy,451,demod,448] {-} neq($c3,nil).
% 0.20/0.51  453 [binary,452.1,182.1] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  ============ end of search ============
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  Process 25265 finished Sun Jun 12 07:07:29 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------