TSTP Solution File: SWC146+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWC146+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:13:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.47s 2.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| neq(X4,nil)
| singletonP(X2) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| neq(X4,nil)
| singletonP(X2) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(esk48_0)
& ssList(esk49_0)
& ssList(esk50_0)
& ssList(esk51_0)
& esk49_0 = esk51_0
& esk48_0 = esk50_0
& neq(esk49_0,nil)
& ~ neq(esk51_0,nil)
& ~ singletonP(esk49_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(esk51_0,nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk49_0,nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(esk49_0,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC146+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 07:19:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.47/2.34 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.47/2.34 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.47/2.34 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.47/2.34 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 7.47/2.34 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.47/2.34 #
% 7.47/2.34 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 7.47/2.34 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.47/2.34
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof found!
% 7.47/2.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.47/2.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.47/2.34 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.47/2.34
% 7.47/2.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.47/2.34 # User time : 0.022 s
% 7.47/2.34 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.47/2.34 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 7.47/2.34 # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 7.47/2.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------