TSTP Solution File: SWC142+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWC142+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:49:53 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 17.36s 3.16s
% Output   : Proof 26.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10  % Problem  : SWC142+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.05/0.11  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 15:51:17 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.17/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.17/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.17/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.17/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.17/0.61  
% 0.17/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.17/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.17/0.61  
% 0.17/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.17/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.17/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.17/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.17/0.61  
% 0.17/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.17/0.61  
% 0.17/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.17/0.62  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.63/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.63/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.63/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.63/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.63/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.63/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.63/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 6.52/1.69  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 6.52/1.70  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 7.10/1.75  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 7.10/1.75  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 7.10/1.75  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 7.10/1.75  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 7.10/1.75  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 16.87/3.08  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.36/3.16  Prover 2: proved (2516ms)
% 17.36/3.16  
% 17.36/3.16  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 17.36/3.16  
% 17.36/3.16  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 19.46/3.42  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.46/3.42  Prover 5: stopped
% 19.46/3.42  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 20.61/3.59  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 20.61/3.63  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 20.61/3.63  Prover 3: stopped
% 20.61/3.66  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 20.61/3.66  Prover 6: stopped
% 21.27/3.67  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 21.27/3.68  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 21.43/3.70  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 21.69/3.73  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 21.80/3.74  Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 21.80/3.74  Prover 1: proved (3108ms)
% 21.80/3.76  Prover 7: stopped
% 22.41/3.88  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 22.41/3.89  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 23.34/3.98  Prover 10: stopped
% 24.67/4.12  Prover 11: stopped
% 25.72/4.31  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 25.72/4.32  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 25.72/4.32  Prover 8: stopped
% 26.29/4.38  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 26.29/4.38  Prover 0: stopped
% 26.56/4.47  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 26.56/4.47  Prover 4: stopped
% 26.56/4.47  
% 26.56/4.47  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 26.56/4.47  
% 26.56/4.48  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 26.56/4.49  Assumptions after simplification:
% 26.56/4.49  ---------------------------------
% 26.56/4.49  
% 26.56/4.49    (co1)
% 26.56/4.49    $false
% 26.56/4.49  
% 26.56/4.49  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 26.56/4.49  --------------------------------------------
% 26.56/4.49  ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20,
% 26.56/4.49  ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32,
% 26.56/4.49  ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44,
% 26.56/4.49  ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56,
% 26.56/4.49  ax57, ax58, ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68,
% 26.56/4.49  ax69, ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8,
% 26.56/4.49  ax80, ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91,
% 26.56/4.49  ax92, ax93, ax94, ax95
% 26.56/4.49  
% 26.56/4.49  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 26.56/4.49  ---------------------------------
% 26.56/4.49  
% 26.56/4.49  Begin of proof
% 26.56/4.50  | 
% 26.56/4.50  | CLOSE: (co1) is inconsistent.
% 26.56/4.50  | 
% 26.56/4.50  End of proof
% 26.56/4.50  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 26.56/4.50  
% 26.56/4.50  3888ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------