TSTP Solution File: SWC140+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWC140+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:41:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 14 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 8 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f464,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f421,f285]) ).
fof(f285,plain,
~ neq(sK25,nil),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f220]) ).
fof(f220,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
& ? [X3] :
( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(X1,nil)
& X0 = X2
& ssList(X3)
& X1 = X3 ) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f219]) ).
fof(f219,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ neq(X3,nil)
& neq(X1,nil)
& X1 = X3
& X0 = X2
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( neq(X3,nil)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| X1 != X3
| X0 != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( neq(X3,nil)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| X1 != X3
| X0 != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(f421,plain,
neq(sK25,nil),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f284,f281]) ).
fof(f281,plain,
sK23 = sK25,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f220]) ).
fof(f284,plain,
neq(sK23,nil),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f220]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWC140+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 18:40:46 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 % (2846)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.19/0.48 % (2852)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.48 % (2858)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.48 % (2849)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (2858)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.49 % (2868)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (2854)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (2866)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (2871)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (2850)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (2861)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (2859)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (2848)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (2858)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50 % (2858)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (2858)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.50 % (2858)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.50 % (2858)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 % (2858)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.19/0.50 % (2858)Time elapsed: 0.097 s
% 0.19/0.50 % (2858)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.19/0.50 % (2858)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (2858)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (2841)Success in time 0.163 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------