TSTP Solution File: SWC138+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWC138+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:13:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.11s 2.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 7 ( 2 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_192,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk49_0,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hgx01exi/input.p',i_0_192) ).
cnf(i_0_194,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hgx01exi/input.p',i_0_194) ).
cnf(i_0_191,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(esk51_0,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hgx01exi/input.p',i_0_191) ).
cnf(c_0_198,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk49_0,nil),
i_0_192 ).
cnf(c_0_199,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
i_0_194 ).
cnf(c_0_200,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(esk51_0,nil),
i_0_191 ).
cnf(c_0_201,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_198,c_0_199]),c_0_200]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC138+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:03:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.11/2.49 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 8.11/2.49 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.11/2.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 8.11/2.49
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof found!
% 8.11/2.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.11/2.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof object total steps : 7
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 8.11/2.49 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.11/2.49 # Parsed axioms : 196
% 8.11/2.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Initial clauses : 196
% 8.11/2.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 196
% 8.11/2.49 # Processed clauses : 6
% 8.11/2.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 8.11/2.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Generated clauses : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Paramodulations : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 8.11/2.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 8.11/2.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 8.11/2.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 190
% 8.11/2.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 707
% 8.11/2.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 8.11/2.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.11/2.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4263
% 8.11/2.49
% 8.11/2.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.11/2.49 # User time : 0.013 s
% 8.11/2.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 8.11/2.49 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 8.11/2.49 # ...preprocessing : 0.014 s
% 8.11/2.49 # ...main loop : 0.000 s
% 8.11/2.49 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.11/2.49
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------