TSTP Solution File: SWC135-1 by Gandalf---c-2.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem : SWC135-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality:r
% Format : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 unknown
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 1000MB
% OS : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s
% Result : Unsatisfiable 19.5s
% Output : Assurance 19.5s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
%
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SWC/SWC135-1+eq_r.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
%
% prove-all-passes started
%
% detected problem class: neq
% detected subclass: big
%
% strategies selected:
% (hyper 28 #f 5 19)
% (binary-unit 28 #f 5 19)
% (binary-double 11 #f 5 19)
% (binary-double 17 #f)
% (binary-double 17 #t)
% (binary 87 #t 5 19)
% (binary-order 28 #f 5 19)
% (binary-posweight-order 58 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 28 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 11 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 28 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder-sos 17 #f)
% (binary-order 28 #f)
% (hyper-order 17 #f)
% (binary 141 #t)
%
%
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
%
%
% timer checkpoints: c(194,40,0,388,0,1,54999,4,2246,56989,5,2803,56990,1,2804,56990,50,2807,56990,40,2807,57184,0,2807)
%
%
% START OF PROOF
% 56683 [?] ?
% 57181 [] equal(sk2,sk4).
% 57183 [] -neq(sk4,nil).
% 57951 [para:57181.1.2,57183.1.1,cut:56683] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
%
% Proof found by the following strategy:
%
% using binary resolution
% not using sos strategy
% using unit strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% using clause demodulation
% clause length limited to 19
% clause depth limited to 5
% seconds given: 28
%
%
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
%
% Global statistics over all passes:
%
% given clauses: 84
% derived clauses: 67971
% kept clauses: 41882
% kept size sum: 607640
% kept mid-nuclei: 14909
% kept new demods: 32372
% forw unit-subs: 4062
% forw double-subs: 1749
% forw overdouble-subs: 397
% backward subs: 0
% fast unit cutoff: 1198
% full unit cutoff: 0
% dbl unit cutoff: 136
% real runtime : 28.60
% process. runtime: 28.12
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics:
% tried: 43766
% length fails: 221
% strength fails: 16247
% predlist fails: 3823
% aux str. fails: 1999
% by-lit fails: 928
% full subs tried: 19710
% full subs fail: 18986
%
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SWC/SWC135-1+eq_r.in")
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------