TSTP Solution File: SWC131+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SWC131+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:41:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 1.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   59 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  236 (  46 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  292 ( 115   ~;  81   |;  68   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;  21  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   85 (   0 sgn;  46   !;  24   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ( cyclefreeP(X0)
      <=> ! [X1] :
            ( ssItem(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssItem(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ! [X4] :
                        ( ssList(X4)
                       => ! [X5] :
                            ( ssList(X5)
                           => ( app(app(X3,cons(X1,X4)),cons(X2,X5)) = X0
                             => ~ ( leq(X2,X1)
                                  & leq(X1,X2) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax8) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax15) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax17) ).

fof(f60,axiom,
    cyclefreeP(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax60) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( cyclefreeP(X1)
                    | neq(X3,nil)
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( cyclefreeP(X1)
                      | neq(X3,nil)
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( cyclefreeP(X0)
      <=> ! [X1] :
            ( ! [X2] :
                ( ! [X3] :
                    ( ! [X4] :
                        ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ~ leq(X2,X1)
                            | ~ leq(X1,X2)
                            | app(app(X3,cons(X1,X4)),cons(X2,X5)) != X0
                            | ~ ssList(X5) )
                        | ~ ssList(X4) )
                    | ~ ssList(X3) )
                | ~ ssItem(X2) )
            | ~ ssItem(X1) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( cyclefreeP(X0)
      <=> ! [X1] :
            ( ! [X2] :
                ( ! [X3] :
                    ( ! [X4] :
                        ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ~ leq(X2,X1)
                            | ~ leq(X1,X2)
                            | app(app(X3,cons(X1,X4)),cons(X2,X5)) != X0
                            | ~ ssList(X5) )
                        | ~ ssList(X4) )
                    | ~ ssList(X3) )
                | ~ ssItem(X2) )
            | ~ ssItem(X1) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f104]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ~ cyclefreeP(X1)
                  & ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ~ cyclefreeP(X1)
                  & ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f221]) ).

fof(f223,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sP0(X0)
    <=> ! [X1] :
          ( ! [X2] :
              ( ! [X3] :
                  ( ! [X4] :
                      ( ! [X5] :
                          ( ~ leq(X2,X1)
                          | ~ leq(X1,X2)
                          | app(app(X3,cons(X1,X4)),cons(X2,X5)) != X0
                          | ~ ssList(X5) )
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  | ~ ssList(X3) )
              | ~ ssItem(X2) )
          | ~ ssItem(X1) ) ),
    introduced(predicate_definition_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP0])]) ).

fof(f224,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( cyclefreeP(X0)
      <=> sP0(X0) )
      | ~ sP1(X0) ),
    introduced(predicate_definition_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP1])]) ).

fof(f225,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sP1(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f105,f224,f223]) ).

fof(f258,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( cyclefreeP(X0)
          | ~ sP0(X0) )
        & ( sP0(X0)
          | ~ cyclefreeP(X0) ) )
      | ~ sP1(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f224]) ).

fof(f316,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 = X1 )
            & ( X0 != X1
              | ~ neq(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

fof(f343,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ~ cyclefreeP(X1)
                    & ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ~ cyclefreeP(X1)
                  & ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  & sK53 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK53) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f344,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ~ cyclefreeP(X1)
                & ~ neq(X3,nil)
                & sK53 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ~ cyclefreeP(sK54)
              & ~ neq(X3,nil)
              & sK53 = X2
              & sK54 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK54) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f345,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ~ cyclefreeP(sK54)
            & ~ neq(X3,nil)
            & sK53 = X2
            & sK54 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ~ cyclefreeP(sK54)
          & ~ neq(X3,nil)
          & sK53 = sK55
          & sK54 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK55) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f346,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ~ cyclefreeP(sK54)
        & ~ neq(X3,nil)
        & sK53 = sK55
        & sK54 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ~ cyclefreeP(sK54)
      & ~ neq(sK56,nil)
      & sK53 = sK55
      & sK54 = sK56
      & ssList(sK56) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f347,plain,
    ( ~ cyclefreeP(sK54)
    & ~ neq(sK56,nil)
    & sK53 = sK55
    & sK54 = sK56
    & ssList(sK56)
    & ssList(sK55)
    & ssList(sK54)
    & ssList(sK53) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56])],[f222,f346,f345,f344,f343]) ).

fof(f370,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sP0(X0)
      | ~ cyclefreeP(X0)
      | ~ sP1(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f258]) ).

fof(f371,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( cyclefreeP(X0)
      | ~ sP0(X0)
      | ~ sP1(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f258]) ).

fof(f381,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sP1(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f225]) ).

fof(f438,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( neq(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f316]) ).

fof(f440,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f497,plain,
    cyclefreeP(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f548,plain,
    ssList(sK54),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f551,plain,
    sK54 = sK56,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f553,plain,
    ~ neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f554,plain,
    ~ cyclefreeP(sK54),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f555,plain,
    ~ cyclefreeP(sK56),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f554,f551]) ).

fof(f556,plain,
    ssList(sK56),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f548,f551]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    ( ~ sP0(X0)
    | ~ sP1(X0)
    | cyclefreeP(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f371]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ( ~ cyclefreeP(X0)
    | ~ sP1(X0)
    | sP0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f370]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X0)
    | sP1(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f381]) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X0 = X1
    | neq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f438]) ).

cnf(c_141,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f440]) ).

cnf(c_198,plain,
    cyclefreeP(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f497]) ).

cnf(c_246,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cyclefreeP(sK56),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f555]) ).

cnf(c_247,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(sK56,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f553]) ).

cnf(c_250,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK56),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f556]) ).

cnf(c_264,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | sP1(nil) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_82]) ).

cnf(c_291,plain,
    ( ~ cyclefreeP(nil)
    | ~ sP1(nil)
    | sP0(nil) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

cnf(c_2981,plain,
    ( X0 != X1
    | ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ cyclefreeP(X1)
    | sP0(X1) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_72]) ).

cnf(c_2982,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ cyclefreeP(X0)
    | sP0(X0) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_2981]) ).

cnf(c_2993,plain,
    ( X0 != X1
    | ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ sP0(X1)
    | cyclefreeP(X1) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_71]) ).

cnf(c_2994,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ sP0(X0)
    | cyclefreeP(X0) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_2993]) ).

cnf(c_3176,plain,
    ( X0 != nil
    | ~ ssList(X0)
    | sP0(X0) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_2982,c_198]) ).

cnf(c_3177,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | sP0(nil) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3176]) ).

cnf(c_3178,plain,
    sP0(nil),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3177,c_198,c_141,c_264,c_291]) ).

cnf(c_3183,plain,
    ( X0 != sK56
    | ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ sP0(X0) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_2994,c_246]) ).

cnf(c_3184,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK56)
    | ~ sP0(sK56) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3183]) ).

cnf(c_3185,plain,
    ~ sP0(sK56),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3184,c_250,c_3184]) ).

cnf(c_3218,plain,
    ( X0 != sK56
    | X1 != nil
    | ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_247]) ).

cnf(c_3219,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK56)
    | sK56 = nil ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3218]) ).

cnf(c_3220,plain,
    sK56 = nil,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3219,c_250,c_141,c_3219]) ).

cnf(c_6084,plain,
    ~ sP0(nil),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3185,c_3220]) ).

cnf(c_6086,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6084,c_3178]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWC131+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 18:43:25 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.47/1.15  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------  iProver source info
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 0.47/1.15  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 0.47/1.15  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.47/1.15  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Parsing...
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e 
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.47/1.16  
% 0.47/1.16  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------