TSTP Solution File: SWC131+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SWC131+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:06:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.79s 2.96s
% Output   : Proof 2.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SWC131+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 20:04:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.79/2.96  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.79/2.96  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.79/2.96  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.79/2.96  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.79/2.96  1. (ssList T_0) (-. (ssList T_0))   ### Axiom
% 2.79/2.96  2. (ssList (nil)) (-. (ssList (nil)))   ### Axiom
% 2.79/2.96  3. (ssList T_1) (-. (ssList T_1))   ### Axiom
% 2.79/2.96  4. (ssList T_1) (-. (ssList T_1))   ### Axiom
% 2.79/2.96  5. (-. (T_1 != T_1)) (T_1 != T_1)   ### Axiom
% 2.79/2.96  6. (T_0 = (nil)) (T_0 != (nil))   ### Axiom
% 2.79/2.96  7. ((nil) != T_1) (T_1 = T_0) (T_0 = (nil)) (-. (T_1 != T_1))   ### Trans-sym 5 6
% 2.79/2.96  8. (T_1 != T_1)   ### Refl(=)
% 2.79/2.96  9. ((neq T_1 T_1) <=> (T_1 != T_1)) (T_0 = (nil)) (T_1 = T_0) ((nil) != T_1)   ### Equiv 7 8
% 2.79/2.96  10. ((ssList T_1) => ((neq T_1 T_1) <=> (T_1 != T_1))) ((nil) != T_1) (T_1 = T_0) (T_0 = (nil)) (ssList T_1)   ### Imply 4 9
% 2.79/2.96  11. (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq T_1 V) <=> (T_1 != V)))) (ssList T_1) (T_0 = (nil)) (T_1 = T_0) ((nil) != T_1)   ### All 10
% 2.79/2.96  12. ((ssList T_1) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq T_1 V) <=> (T_1 != V))))) ((nil) != T_1) (T_1 = T_0) (T_0 = (nil)) (ssList T_1)   ### Imply 3 11
% 2.79/2.96  13. (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (ssList T_1) (T_0 = (nil)) (T_1 = T_0) ((nil) != T_1)   ### All 12
% 2.79/2.96  14. (-. (T_0 != (nil))) ((nil) != T_1) (T_1 = T_0) (ssList T_1) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V))))))   ### NotNot 13
% 2.79/2.96  15. (-. (neq T_0 (nil))) (neq T_0 (nil))   ### Axiom
% 2.79/2.96  16. ((neq T_0 (nil)) <=> (T_0 != (nil))) (-. (neq T_0 (nil))) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (ssList T_1) (T_1 = T_0) ((nil) != T_1)   ### Equiv 14 15
% 2.79/2.96  17. ((ssList (nil)) => ((neq T_0 (nil)) <=> (T_0 != (nil)))) ((nil) != T_1) (T_1 = T_0) (ssList T_1) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (-. (neq T_0 (nil))) (ssList (nil))   ### Imply 2 16
% 2.79/2.96  18. (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq T_0 V) <=> (T_0 != V)))) (ssList (nil)) (-. (neq T_0 (nil))) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (ssList T_1) (T_1 = T_0) ((nil) != T_1)   ### All 17
% 2.79/2.96  19. ((ssList T_0) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq T_0 V) <=> (T_0 != V))))) ((nil) != T_1) (T_1 = T_0) (ssList T_1) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (-. (neq T_0 (nil))) (ssList (nil)) (ssList T_0)   ### Imply 1 18
% 2.79/2.96  20. (ssList T_0) (ssList (nil)) (-. (neq T_0 (nil))) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (ssList T_1) (T_1 = T_0) ((nil) != T_1)   ### All 19
% 2.79/2.96  21. (-. (cyclefreeP T_1)) (cyclefreeP (nil)) (T_1 = T_0) (ssList T_1) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (-. (neq T_0 (nil))) (ssList (nil)) (ssList T_0)   ### P-NotP 20
% 2.79/2.96  22. (-. ((ssList T_0) => ((T_1 != T_0) \/ ((T_2 != T_3) \/ ((neq T_0 (nil)) \/ (cyclefreeP T_1)))))) (ssList (nil)) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (ssList T_1) (cyclefreeP (nil))   ### ConjTree 21
% 2.79/2.96  23. (-. (All X, ((ssList X) => ((T_1 != X) \/ ((T_2 != T_3) \/ ((neq X (nil)) \/ (cyclefreeP T_1))))))) (cyclefreeP (nil)) (ssList T_1) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (ssList (nil))   ### NotAllEx 22
% 2.79/2.97  24. (-. ((ssList T_3) => (All X, ((ssList X) => ((T_1 != X) \/ ((T_2 != T_3) \/ ((neq X (nil)) \/ (cyclefreeP T_1)))))))) (ssList (nil)) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (ssList T_1) (cyclefreeP (nil))   ### NotImply 23
% 2.79/2.97  25. (-. (All W, ((ssList W) => (All X, ((ssList X) => ((T_1 != X) \/ ((T_2 != W) \/ ((neq X (nil)) \/ (cyclefreeP T_1))))))))) (cyclefreeP (nil)) (ssList T_1) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (ssList (nil))   ### NotAllEx 24
% 2.79/2.97  26. (-. ((ssList T_1) => (All W, ((ssList W) => (All X, ((ssList X) => ((T_1 != X) \/ ((T_2 != W) \/ ((neq X (nil)) \/ (cyclefreeP T_1)))))))))) (ssList (nil)) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (cyclefreeP (nil))   ### NotImply 25
% 2.79/2.97  27. (-. (All V, ((ssList V) => (All W, ((ssList W) => (All X, ((ssList X) => ((V != X) \/ ((T_2 != W) \/ ((neq X (nil)) \/ (cyclefreeP V))))))))))) (cyclefreeP (nil)) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (ssList (nil))   ### NotAllEx 26
% 2.79/2.97  28. (-. ((ssList T_2) => (All V, ((ssList V) => (All W, ((ssList W) => (All X, ((ssList X) => ((V != X) \/ ((T_2 != W) \/ ((neq X (nil)) \/ (cyclefreeP V)))))))))))) (ssList (nil)) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (cyclefreeP (nil))   ### NotImply 27
% 2.79/2.97  29. (-. (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => (All W, ((ssList W) => (All X, ((ssList X) => ((V != X) \/ ((U != W) \/ ((neq X (nil)) \/ (cyclefreeP V))))))))))))) (cyclefreeP (nil)) (All U, ((ssList U) => (All V, ((ssList V) => ((neq U V) <=> (U != V)))))) (ssList (nil))   ### NotAllEx 28
% 2.79/2.97  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.79/2.97  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------