TSTP Solution File: SWC131+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWC131+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:26:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 52 ( 18 ~; 15 |; 8 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| neq(X4,nil)
| cyclefreeP(X2) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co1) ).
fof(ax15,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( neq(X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).
fof(ax17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).
fof(ax60,axiom,
cyclefreeP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax60) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| neq(X4,nil)
| cyclefreeP(X2) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
& ~ cyclefreeP(esk2_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ neq(X3,X4)
| X3 != X4
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3) )
& ( X3 = X4
| neq(X3,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax15])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(esk4_0,nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( neq(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk4_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
cyclefreeP(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax60]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
nil = esk4_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ cyclefreeP(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
cyclefreeP(esk4_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_8]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC131+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 19:46:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 65
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 57
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 57
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 61
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 57
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 128
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 120
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 119
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 30
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 55
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 326
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 215
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 64
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7099
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3184 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------