TSTP Solution File: SWC126+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWC126+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:13:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.45s 2.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  19 unt;   2 nHn;  50 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  128 (  23 equ;  83 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_195,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(esk52_0,nil) = esk50_0
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_195) ).

cnf(i_0_201,negated_conjecture,
    esk50_0 = esk48_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_201) ).

cnf(i_0_202,negated_conjecture,
    esk49_0 = esk51_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_202) ).

cnf(i_0_200,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk49_0,nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_200) ).

cnf(i_0_197,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk52_0)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_197) ).

cnf(i_0_149,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | app(app(X3,X2),X4) != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_149) ).

cnf(i_0_155,plain,
    ( app(app(X1,X2),X3) = app(X1,app(X2,X3))
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_155) ).

cnf(i_0_154,plain,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_154) ).

cnf(i_0_204,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk50_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_204) ).

cnf(i_0_82,plain,
    ( app(esk29_2(X1,X2),cons(X2,esk30_2(X1,X2))) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_82) ).

cnf(i_0_83,plain,
    ( ssList(esk30_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_83) ).

cnf(i_0_191,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk48_0,nil)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_191) ).

cnf(i_0_84,plain,
    ( ssList(esk29_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_84) ).

cnf(i_0_193,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(esk51_0,esk52_0)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_193) ).

cnf(i_0_205,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk49_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_205) ).

cnf(i_0_53,plain,
    ( cons(X1,X2) != nil
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_44,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_41,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4pmv4p2z/input.p',i_0_41) ).

cnf(c_0_224,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(esk52_0,nil) = esk50_0
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    i_0_195 ).

cnf(c_0_225,negated_conjecture,
    esk50_0 = esk48_0,
    i_0_201 ).

cnf(c_0_226,negated_conjecture,
    esk49_0 = esk51_0,
    i_0_202 ).

cnf(c_0_227,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk49_0,nil),
    i_0_200 ).

cnf(c_0_228,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk52_0)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    i_0_197 ).

cnf(c_0_229,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | app(app(X3,X2),X4) != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    i_0_149 ).

cnf(c_0_230,plain,
    ( app(app(X1,X2),X3) = app(X1,app(X2,X3))
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    i_0_155 ).

cnf(c_0_231,plain,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    i_0_154 ).

cnf(c_0_232,negated_conjecture,
    cons(esk52_0,nil) = esk48_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_224,c_0_225]),c_0_226]),c_0_227])]) ).

cnf(c_0_233,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk52_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_228,c_0_226]),c_0_227])]) ).

cnf(c_0_234,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk50_0),
    i_0_204 ).

cnf(c_0_235,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | app(X3,app(X2,X4)) != X1
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_229,c_0_230]) ).

cnf(c_0_236,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(esk48_0,X1) = cons(esk52_0,X1)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_231,c_0_232]),c_0_233])]) ).

cnf(c_0_237,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk48_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_234,c_0_225]) ).

cnf(c_0_238,negated_conjecture,
    ( segmentP(X1,esk48_0)
    | app(X2,cons(esk52_0,X3)) != X1
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_235,c_0_236]),c_0_237])]) ).

cnf(c_0_239,plain,
    ( app(esk29_2(X1,X2),cons(X2,esk30_2(X1,X2))) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_82 ).

cnf(c_0_240,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,esk48_0)
    | ~ memberP(X1,esk52_0)
    | ~ ssList(esk30_2(X1,esk52_0))
    | ~ ssList(esk29_2(X1,esk52_0))
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_238,c_0_239]),c_0_233])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_241,plain,
    ( ssList(esk30_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_83 ).

cnf(c_0_242,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk48_0,nil)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0) ),
    i_0_191 ).

cnf(c_0_243,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,esk48_0)
    | ~ memberP(X1,esk52_0)
    | ~ ssList(esk29_2(X1,esk52_0))
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_240,c_0_241]),c_0_233])]) ).

cnf(c_0_244,plain,
    ( ssList(esk29_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_84 ).

cnf(c_0_245,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(esk51_0,esk52_0)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    i_0_193 ).

cnf(c_0_246,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0)
    | ~ neq(esk48_0,nil) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_242,c_0_226]),c_0_227])]) ).

cnf(c_0_247,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,esk48_0)
    | ~ memberP(X1,esk52_0)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_243,c_0_244]),c_0_233])]) ).

cnf(c_0_248,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(esk49_0,esk52_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_245,c_0_226]),c_0_226]),c_0_227])]) ).

cnf(c_0_249,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk49_0),
    i_0_205 ).

cnf(c_0_250,plain,
    ( cons(X1,X2) != nil
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_251,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_252,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(esk48_0,nil),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_246,c_0_247]),c_0_248]),c_0_249])]) ).

cnf(c_0_253,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    i_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_254,negated_conjecture,
    esk48_0 != nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_250,c_0_232]),c_0_233]),c_0_251])]) ).

cnf(c_0_255,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_252,c_0_253]),c_0_251]),c_0_237])]),c_0_254]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SWC126+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 02:41:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.44  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.45/2.36  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 8.45/2.36  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.45/2.36  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 8.45/2.36  
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof found!
% 8.45/2.36  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.45/2.36  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof object total steps             : 50
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof object clause steps            : 32
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof object formula steps           : 18
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof object conjectures             : 27
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 18
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 9
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 18
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 18
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof object generating inferences   : 9
% 8.45/2.36  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 36
% 8.45/2.36  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.45/2.36  # Parsed axioms                        : 204
% 8.45/2.36  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.45/2.36  # Initial clauses                      : 204
% 8.45/2.36  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 8.45/2.36  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 204
% 8.45/2.36  # Processed clauses                    : 1003
% 8.45/2.36  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 8.45/2.36  # ...subsumed                          : 434
% 8.45/2.36  # ...remaining for further processing  : 556
% 8.45/2.36  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 224
% 8.45/2.36  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.45/2.36  # Backward-subsumed                    : 19
% 8.45/2.36  # Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 8.45/2.36  # Generated clauses                    : 4814
% 8.45/2.36  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 4251
% 8.45/2.36  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 438
% 8.45/2.36  # Paramodulations                      : 4493
% 8.45/2.36  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 8.45/2.36  # Equation resolutions                 : 321
% 8.45/2.36  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.45/2.36  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 8.45/2.36  # Current number of processed clauses  : 523
% 8.45/2.36  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 38
% 8.45/2.36  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.45/2.36  #    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 8.45/2.36  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 470
% 8.45/2.36  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3167
% 8.45/2.36  # ...number of literals in the above   : 22838
% 8.45/2.36  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.45/2.36  # Current number of archived clauses   : 27
% 8.45/2.36  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 69836
% 8.45/2.36  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10488
% 8.45/2.36  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 698
% 8.45/2.36  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1846
% 8.45/2.36  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.45/2.36  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 8.45/2.36  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 8.45/2.36  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.45/2.36  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.45/2.36  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 92436
% 8.45/2.36  
% 8.45/2.36  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.45/2.36  # User time                : 0.117 s
% 8.45/2.36  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 8.45/2.36  # Total time               : 0.123 s
% 8.45/2.36  # ...preprocessing         : 0.012 s
% 8.45/2.36  # ...main loop             : 0.110 s
% 8.45/2.36  # Maximum resident set size: 8672 pages
% 8.45/2.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------