TSTP Solution File: SWC126+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWC126+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:26:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.50s 46.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 51 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 224 ( 39 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 28 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 291 ( 118 ~; 117 |; 30 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 23 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 19 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 72 ( 0 sgn 40 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ( ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
| ! [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
=> ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
| ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
| ( neq(X1,nil)
& segmentP(X2,X1) ) )
& ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
| neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(ax81,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> cons(X2,X1) = app(cons(X2,nil),X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax81) ).
fof(ax7,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( segmentP(X1,X2)
<=> ? [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
& ? [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
& app(app(X3,X2),X4) = X1 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax7) ).
fof(ax82,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> app(app(X1,X2),X3) = app(X1,app(X2,X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax82) ).
fof(ax3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> ( memberP(X1,X2)
<=> ? [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
& ? [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
& app(X3,cons(X2,X4)) = X1 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax3) ).
fof(ax21,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> nil != cons(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax21) ).
fof(ax15,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( neq(X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).
fof(ax17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ( ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
| ! [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
=> ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
| ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
| ( neq(X1,nil)
& segmentP(X2,X1) ) )
& ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
| neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
| neq(esk2_0,nil) )
& ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
| neq(esk2_0,nil) )
& ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
| ssItem(esk5_0) )
& ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
| ssItem(esk5_0) )
& ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
| cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0 )
& ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
| cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0 )
& ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
| memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0) )
& ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
| memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0) )
& ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
| ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
| ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0) )
& ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
| ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
| ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( neq(esk2_0,nil)
| neq(esk2_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X4)
| cons(X4,X3) = app(cons(X4,nil),X3) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax81])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0
| ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk2_0,nil),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk5_0)
| ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk5_0)
| neq(esk2_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X5,X6,X9,X10] :
( ( ssList(esk6_2(X5,X6))
| ~ segmentP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( ssList(esk7_2(X5,X6))
| ~ segmentP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( app(app(esk6_2(X5,X6),X6),esk7_2(X5,X6)) = X5
| ~ segmentP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( ~ ssList(X9)
| ~ ssList(X10)
| app(app(X9,X6),X10) != X5
| segmentP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax7])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X5)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| app(app(X4,X5),X6) = app(X4,app(X5,X6)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax82])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X5,X6,X9,X10] :
( ( ssList(esk8_2(X5,X6))
| ~ memberP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( ssList(esk9_2(X5,X6))
| ~ memberP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( app(esk8_2(X5,X6),cons(X6,esk9_2(X5,X6))) = X5
| ~ memberP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( ~ ssList(X9)
| ~ ssList(X10)
| app(X9,cons(X6,X10)) != X5
| memberP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( cons(X1,X2) = app(cons(X1,nil),X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk1_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(esk5_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( segmentP(X1,X2)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| app(app(X3,X2),X4) != X1
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( app(app(X1,X2),X3) = app(X1,app(X2,X3))
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( app(esk8_2(X1,X2),cons(X2,esk9_2(X1,X2))) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk5_0,X1) = app(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( segmentP(X1,X2)
| app(X3,app(X2,X4)) != X1
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( app(esk8_2(X1,esk5_0),app(esk1_0,esk9_2(X1,esk5_0))) = X1
| ~ memberP(X1,esk5_0)
| ~ ssList(esk9_2(X1,esk5_0))
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( segmentP(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ memberP(X1,esk5_0)
| ~ ssList(esk9_2(X1,esk5_0))
| ~ ssList(esk8_2(X1,esk5_0))
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ssList(esk9_2(X1,X2))
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0)
| neq(esk2_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
| ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( segmentP(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ memberP(X1,esk5_0)
| ~ ssList(esk8_2(X1,esk5_0))
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ssList(esk8_2(X1,X2))
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0)
| ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(esk2_0,esk5_0)
| neq(esk2_0,nil) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_39,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X4)
| nil != cons(X4,X3) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax21])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| ~ neq(esk1_0,nil) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( segmentP(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ memberP(X1,esk5_0)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
memberP(esk2_0,esk5_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_44,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ neq(X3,X4)
| X3 != X4
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3) )
& ( X3 = X4
| neq(X3,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax15])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( nil != cons(X1,X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(esk1_0,nil),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_43])]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( neq(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_22]),c_0_46]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_46]),c_0_30])]),c_0_49]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : SWC126+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.08/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 02:52:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.35/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.35/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.35/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.35/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/46.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/46.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/46.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/46.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/46.68 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.50/46.68
% 0.50/46.68 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.50/46.68 # OLD status Res
% 0.50/46.68 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.50/46.68 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.50/46.68 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.50/46.68
% 0.50/46.68 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.50/46.68 # OLD status Res
% 0.50/46.68 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 0.50/46.68 # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.50/46.68 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_48e494e00e0717ec2eabf59b73b2d711334607de for 23 seconds:
% 0.50/46.68 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,03,20000,1.0)
% 0.50/46.68 # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.50/46.68
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof found!
% 0.50/46.68 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.50/46.68 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof object total steps : 51
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof object clause steps : 35
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof object formula steps : 16
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof object conjectures : 28
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof object clause conjectures : 25
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof object initial clauses used : 20
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof object generating inferences : 9
% 0.50/46.68 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 35
% 0.50/46.68 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.50/46.68 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.50/46.68 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 66
% 0.50/46.68 # Initial clauses : 65
% 0.50/46.68 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.50/46.68 # Initial clauses in saturation : 65
% 0.50/46.68 # Processed clauses : 3165
% 0.50/46.68 # ...of these trivial : 35
% 0.50/46.68 # ...subsumed : 2644
% 0.50/46.68 # ...remaining for further processing : 486
% 0.50/46.68 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 46
% 0.50/46.68 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.50/46.68 # Backward-subsumed : 18
% 0.50/46.68 # Backward-rewritten : 32
% 0.50/46.68 # Generated clauses : 9777
% 0.50/46.68 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8948
% 0.50/46.68 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 425
% 0.50/46.68 # Paramodulations : 9695
% 0.50/46.68 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.50/46.68 # Equation resolutions : 82
% 0.50/46.68 # Current number of processed clauses : 433
% 0.50/46.68 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 76
% 0.50/46.68 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.50/46.68 # Negative unit clauses : 80
% 0.50/46.68 # Non-unit-clauses : 277
% 0.50/46.68 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5593
% 0.50/46.68 # ...number of literals in the above : 31421
% 0.50/46.68 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.50/46.68 # Current number of archived clauses : 50
% 0.50/46.68 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 27226
% 0.50/46.68 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8673
% 0.50/46.68 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 778
% 0.50/46.68 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1021
% 0.50/46.68 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.50/46.68 # BW rewrite match attempts : 136
% 0.50/46.68 # BW rewrite match successes : 19
% 0.50/46.68 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.50/46.68 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.50/46.68 # Termbank termtop insertions : 126524
% 0.50/46.68
% 0.50/46.68 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/46.68 # User time : 0.125 s
% 0.50/46.68 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.50/46.68 # Total time : 0.131 s
% 0.50/46.68 # Maximum resident set size: 9396 pages
% 0.50/69.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/69.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/69.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/69.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/69.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/69.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/69.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/69.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/69.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/69.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/69.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/69.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/69.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/69.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/69.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/69.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/69.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/69.51 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------