TSTP Solution File: SWC118-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWC118-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:41:35 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 36 ( 22 unt; 3 nHn; 36 RR)
% Number of literals : 66 ( 22 equ; 35 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',co1_1) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk2
| nil != sk1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',co1_14) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(clause100,axiom,
( neq(X2,X1)
| X2 = X1
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',clause100) ).
cnf(co1_13,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| nil != sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',co1_13) ).
cnf(co1_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk1,nil)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',co1_15) ).
cnf(clause8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',clause8) ).
cnf(clause173,axiom,
( segmentP(X4,X2)
| app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',clause173) ).
cnf(co1_2,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',co1_2) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
app(app(sk5,sk3),sk6) = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
co1_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk2
| nil != sk1 ),
co1_14 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
( neq(X2,X1)
| X2 = X1
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
clause100 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| nil != sk3 ),
co1_13 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( sk3 != nil
| sk4 != nil ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk1,nil)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
co1_15 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = sk3
| neq(sk3,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
ssList(nil),
clause8 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
sk3 != nil,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
( segmentP(X4,X2)
| app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X4) ),
clause173 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk2),
co1_2 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk3,nil)
| ~ segmentP(sk4,sk3) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk3,nil),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( segmentP(app(app(X1,X2),X3),X2)
| ~ ssList(app(app(X1,X2),X3))
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
app(app(sk5,sk3),sk6) = sk4,
co1_9 ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk4),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk6),
co1_8 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk5),
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ segmentP(sk4,sk3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_18]),c_0_33])]),c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWC118-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 01:59:30 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ys8DxsA8hx/E---3.1_18026.p
% 0.22/0.54 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # new_bool_3 with pid 18187 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 18191 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 200
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 127
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses : 73
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 73
% 0.22/0.54 # Processed clauses : 180
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.22/0.54 # ...subsumed : 6
% 0.22/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 171
% 0.22/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 15
% 0.22/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Generated clauses : 191
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 171
% 0.22/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Paramodulations : 172
% 0.22/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 19
% 0.22/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 89
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 88
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 68
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 125
% 0.22/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 673
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 73
% 0.22/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2803
% 0.22/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 364
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.22/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.22/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6850
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1972 pages
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1856 pages
% 0.22/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------