TSTP Solution File: SWC117-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC117-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:59:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.67s 0.85s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC117-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 11:53:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.43 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.43 The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.43 Sun Jun 12 11:53:42 2022
% 0.19/0.43 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 19784.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.43 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.43 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.43 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.43 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.43 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.43 139 back subsumes 138.
% 0.19/0.43 149 back subsumes 143.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 432 during input processing: 0 [copy,432,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 336.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 280.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 279.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 278.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 268.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 255.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 254.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 253.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 216.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 204.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 203.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 202.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 201.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 184.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 181.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 179.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 175.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 172.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 149.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 148.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 147.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 146.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 145.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 137.
% 0.19/0.43 432 back subsumes 136.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.41/0.61 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.41/0.61 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.41/0.61 number of clauses in intial UL: 336
% 0.41/0.61 number of clauses initially in problem: 398
% 0.41/0.61 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.41/0.61 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.41/0.61 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.41/0.61 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.41/0.61 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.41/0.61 distinct function count: 46
% 0.41/0.61 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.60/0.84 cons(skac3,app(nil,nil))=app(cons(skac3,nil),nil).
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.60/0.84 38 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1213.5 K.
% 0.60/0.84 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.60/0.84 sym_ent ( 304) 180 0 180 0 53.4 K
% 0.60/0.84 term ( 32) 76945 71449 5496 12 172.1 K
% 0.60/0.84 rel ( 40) 55182 49306 5876 10 229.9 K
% 0.60/0.84 term_ptr ( 16) 22770 1989 20781 20 325.0 K
% 0.60/0.84 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.84 fpa_head ( 24) 1888 45 1843 8 43.4 K
% 0.60/0.84 fpa_tree ( 56) 8977 8977 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.60/0.84 context (1288) 14999 14999 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.60/0.84 trail ( 24) 95550 95550 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.60/0.84 imd_tree ( 32) 27 5 22 5 0.8 K
% 0.60/0.84 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.84 is_tree ( 24) 1274 66 1208 11 28.6 K
% 0.60/0.84 is_pos (2424) 60320 60320 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.60/0.84 fsub_pos ( 16) 8434 8434 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.84 literal ( 32) 18598 14880 3718 2 116.2 K
% 0.60/0.84 clause ( 88) 3382 2489 893 1 76.8 K
% 0.60/0.84 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.60/0.84 clash_nd ( 80) 4477 4477 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.60/0.84 clause_ptr ( 16) 788 71 717 3 11.2 K
% 0.60/0.84 int_ptr ( 16) 7306 3680 3626 5 56.7 K
% 0.60/0.84 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.84 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.84 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.84 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.84 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.84 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.84 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.60/0.84 e 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 hints keep time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 sort lits time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 forward subsume 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 hints time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 conflict time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 new demod time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 post_process time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 back demod time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 back subsume 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 factor time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84 unindex time 0.00
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 true clauses given 1 (14.3%)
% 0.60/0.84 false clauses given 6
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 FALSE TRUE
% 0.60/0.84 2 3 3
% 0.60/0.84 3 34 8
% 0.60/0.84 4 6 7
% 0.60/0.84 7 0 29
% 0.60/0.84 9 0 11
% 0.60/0.84 10 0 2
% 0.60/0.84 11 0 45
% 0.60/0.84 12 0 18
% 0.60/0.84 13 0 30
% 0.60/0.84 14 0 8
% 0.60/0.84 15 0 23
% 0.60/0.84 16 0 13
% 0.60/0.84 17 0 11
% 0.60/0.84 19 0 5
% 0.60/0.84 21 0 15
% 0.60/0.84 22 0 11
% 0.60/0.84 23 0 5
% 0.60/0.84 tot: 43 244 (85.0% true)
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.60/0.84 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.60/0.84 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.60/0.84 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.60/0.84 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.60/0.84 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.60/0.84 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.60/0.84 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.60/0.84 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.60/0.84 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.60/0.84 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.60/0.84 All others: 549.
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.60/0.84
% 0.60/0.84 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------