TSTP Solution File: SWC114-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC114-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:59:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.66s 0.89s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SWC114-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 20:54:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.43 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.43 The process was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.43 Sat Jun 11 20:54:51 2022
% 0.19/0.43 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 18584.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.43 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.43 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.43 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.43 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.43 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.43 142 back subsumes 141.
% 0.19/0.43 152 back subsumes 146.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 443 during input processing: 0 [copy,443,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 339.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 283.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 282.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 281.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 271.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 258.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 257.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 256.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 219.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 207.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 206.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 205.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 204.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 187.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 184.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 182.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 178.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 175.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 152.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 151.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 150.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 149.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 148.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 140.
% 0.19/0.43 443 back subsumes 139.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.48 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.48 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.48 number of clauses in intial UL: 336
% 0.19/0.48 number of clauses initially in problem: 403
% 0.19/0.48 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.19/0.48 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 95
% 0.19/0.48 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.48 absolute distinct symbol count: 74
% 0.19/0.48 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.19/0.48 distinct function count: 46
% 0.19/0.48 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.66/0.89 cons(skac3,app(sk1,nil))=app(cons(skac3,sk1),nil).
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.66/0.89 37 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1181.5 K.
% 0.66/0.89 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.66/0.89 sym_ent ( 304) 181 0 181 0 53.7 K
% 0.66/0.89 term ( 32) 77381 72116 5265 7 164.8 K
% 0.66/0.89 rel ( 40) 56270 50639 5631 3 220.1 K
% 0.66/0.89 term_ptr ( 16) 22069 1996 20073 51 314.4 K
% 0.66/0.89 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.66/0.89 fpa_head ( 24) 2151 53 2098 4 49.3 K
% 0.66/0.89 fpa_tree ( 56) 12084 12084 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.66/0.89 context (1288) 16241 16241 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.66/0.89 trail ( 24) 88250 88250 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.66/0.89 imd_tree ( 32) 68 16 52 7 1.8 K
% 0.66/0.89 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.66/0.89 is_tree ( 24) 1529 115 1414 33 33.9 K
% 0.66/0.89 is_pos (2424) 54775 54775 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.66/0.89 fsub_pos ( 16) 7510 7510 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.66/0.89 literal ( 32) 17811 14493 3318 0 103.7 K
% 0.66/0.89 clause ( 88) 3184 2334 850 0 73.0 K
% 0.66/0.89 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.66/0.89 clash_nd ( 80) 6602 6602 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.66/0.89 clause_ptr ( 16) 775 106 669 4 10.5 K
% 0.66/0.89 int_ptr ( 16) 6465 3680 2785 0 43.5 K
% 0.66/0.89 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.66/0.89 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.66/0.89 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.66/0.89 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.66/0.89 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.66/0.89 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.66/0.89 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.66/0.89 time 0.00
% 0.66/0.89 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.66/0.89 conflict time 0.00
% 0.66/0.89 new demod time 0.00
% 0.66/0.89 post_process time 0.00
% 0.66/0.89 back demod time 0.00
% 0.66/0.89 back subsume 0.00
% 0.66/0.89 factor time 0.00
% 0.66/0.89 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.66/0.89 unindex time 0.00
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 true clauses given 1 (20.0%)
% 0.66/0.89 false clauses given 4
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 FALSE TRUE
% 0.66/0.89 2 1 6
% 0.66/0.89 3 35 9
% 0.66/0.89 4 8 7
% 0.66/0.89 5 1 2
% 0.66/0.89 6 1 3
% 0.66/0.89 7 0 11
% 0.66/0.89 8 0 2
% 0.66/0.89 9 1 10
% 0.66/0.89 11 1 18
% 0.66/0.89 12 0 16
% 0.66/0.89 13 0 14
% 0.66/0.89 14 0 6
% 0.66/0.89 15 0 13
% 0.66/0.89 16 0 7
% 0.66/0.89 17 0 7
% 0.66/0.89 19 0 3
% 0.66/0.89 21 0 9
% 0.66/0.89 22 0 5
% 0.66/0.89 23 0 3
% 0.66/0.89 tot: 48 151 (75.9% true)
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.66/0.89 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.66/0.89 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.66/0.89 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.66/0.89 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.66/0.89 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.66/0.89 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.66/0.89 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.66/0.89 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.66/0.89 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.66/0.89 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.66/0.89 All others: 493.
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.66/0.89
% 0.66/0.89 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------