TSTP Solution File: SWC110+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWC110+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:39:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  192 (  67 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   26 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  247 (  96   ~;  92   |;  37   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;  19  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   24 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0 sgn;  33   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ! [X5] :
                        ( ssList(X5)
                       => ( app(X3,X5) != X4
                          | ~ equalelemsP(X3)
                          | ? [X6] :
                              ( ssItem(X6)
                              & ? [X7] :
                                  ( ssList(X7)
                                  & app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
                                  & ? [X8] :
                                      ( ssList(X8)
                                      & app(X8,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 ) ) ) ) )
                    | ( nil != X4
                      & nil = X3 )
                    | ( ( nil != X2
                        | nil = X1 )
                      & ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                        | ( neq(X1,nil)
                          & segmentP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EN9LoGYzcw/E---3.1_16539.p',co1) ).

fof(ax15,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EN9LoGYzcw/E---3.1_16539.p',ax15) ).

fof(ax7,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( segmentP(X1,X2)
          <=> ? [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
                & ? [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                    & app(app(X3,X2),X4) = X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EN9LoGYzcw/E---3.1_16539.p',ax7) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EN9LoGYzcw/E---3.1_16539.p',ax17) ).

fof(ax83,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( nil = app(X1,X2)
          <=> ( nil = X2
              & nil = X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EN9LoGYzcw/E---3.1_16539.p',ax83) ).

fof(ax28,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EN9LoGYzcw/E---3.1_16539.p',ax28) ).

fof(ax26,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ssList(app(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EN9LoGYzcw/E---3.1_16539.p',ax26) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ! [X5] :
                          ( ssList(X5)
                         => ( app(X3,X5) != X4
                            | ~ equalelemsP(X3)
                            | ? [X6] :
                                ( ssItem(X6)
                                & ? [X7] :
                                    ( ssList(X7)
                                    & app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
                                    & ? [X8] :
                                        ( ssList(X8)
                                        & app(X8,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 ) ) ) ) )
                      | ( nil != X4
                        & nil = X3 )
                      | ( ( nil != X2
                          | nil = X1 )
                        & ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                          | ( neq(X1,nil)
                            & segmentP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X14,X15,X16] :
      ( ssList(esk1_0)
      & ssList(esk2_0)
      & ssList(esk3_0)
      & ssList(esk4_0)
      & esk2_0 = esk4_0
      & esk1_0 = esk3_0
      & ssList(esk5_0)
      & app(esk3_0,esk5_0) = esk4_0
      & equalelemsP(esk3_0)
      & ( ~ ssItem(X14)
        | ~ ssList(X15)
        | app(cons(X14,nil),X15) != esk5_0
        | ~ ssList(X16)
        | app(X16,cons(X14,nil)) != esk3_0 )
      & ( nil = esk4_0
        | nil != esk3_0 )
      & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
        | nil = esk2_0 )
      & ( ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
        | ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0)
        | nil = esk2_0 )
      & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
        | nil != esk1_0 )
      & ( ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
        | ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0)
        | nil != esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X37,X38] :
      ( ( ~ neq(X37,X38)
        | X37 != X38
        | ~ ssList(X38)
        | ~ ssList(X37) )
      & ( X37 = X38
        | neq(X37,X38)
        | ~ ssList(X38)
        | ~ ssList(X37) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax15])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk4_0
    | nil != esk3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
    | nil != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 = nil
    | esk1_0 != nil ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X21,X22] :
      ( ( ssList(esk6_2(X17,X18))
        | ~ segmentP(X17,X18)
        | ~ ssList(X18)
        | ~ ssList(X17) )
      & ( ssList(esk7_2(X17,X18))
        | ~ segmentP(X17,X18)
        | ~ ssList(X18)
        | ~ ssList(X17) )
      & ( app(app(esk6_2(X17,X18),X18),esk7_2(X17,X18)) = X17
        | ~ segmentP(X17,X18)
        | ~ ssList(X18)
        | ~ ssList(X17) )
      & ( ~ ssList(X21)
        | ~ ssList(X22)
        | app(app(X21,X18),X22) != X17
        | segmentP(X17,X18)
        | ~ ssList(X18)
        | ~ ssList(X17) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax7])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(nil,nil)
    | esk1_0 != nil ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X61,X62] :
      ( ( nil = X62
        | nil != app(X61,X62)
        | ~ ssList(X62)
        | ~ ssList(X61) )
      & ( nil = X61
        | nil != app(X61,X62)
        | ~ ssList(X62)
        | ~ ssList(X61) )
      & ( nil != X62
        | nil != X61
        | nil = app(X61,X62)
        | ~ ssList(X62)
        | ~ ssList(X61) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax83])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk3_0,esk5_0) = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( segmentP(X4,X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(app(X1,X3),X2) != X4
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X49] :
      ( ~ ssList(X49)
      | app(nil,X49) = X49 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax28])]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X44,X45] :
      ( ~ ssList(X44)
      | ~ ssList(X45)
      | ssList(app(X44,X45)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax26])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( X1 = nil
    | neq(X1,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( nil = X1
    | nil != app(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk1_0,esk5_0) = esk2_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_12]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( segmentP(app(app(X1,X2),X3),X2)
    | ~ ssList(app(app(X1,X2),X3))
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( app(nil,X1) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ssList(app(X1,X2))
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk2_0
    | ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk1_0,nil),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 != nil,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_27])]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( segmentP(app(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_18])]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_30]),c_0_27]),c_0_31])]),c_0_39]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : SWC110+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:39:37 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EN9LoGYzcw/E---3.1_16539.p
% 0.16/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # new_bool_1 with pid 16619 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 16621 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.16/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 67
% 0.16/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 62
% 0.16/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 62
% 0.16/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 823
% 0.16/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 17
% 0.16/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 264
% 0.16/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 542
% 0.16/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 17
% 0.16/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 30
% 0.16/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.16/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 3099
% 0.16/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2911
% 0.16/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 31
% 0.16/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 3078
% 0.16/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 21
% 0.16/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 982
% 0.16/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 443
% 0.16/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 33
% 0.16/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 27
% 0.16/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 383
% 0.16/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2181
% 0.16/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 8936
% 0.16/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 93
% 0.16/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15122
% 0.16/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6869
% 0.16/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 246
% 0.16/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 591
% 0.16/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.16/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.16/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 55618
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50  # User time                : 0.067 s
% 0.16/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.50  # Total time               : 0.070 s
% 0.16/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 2040 pages
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50  # User time                : 0.072 s
% 0.16/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.50  # Total time               : 0.075 s
% 0.16/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
% 0.16/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------