TSTP Solution File: SWC103+1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SWC103+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:38:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   94 (  31   ~;  26   |;  26   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   8   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f223,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f215,f216,f221,f222]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ( spl9_5
    | ~ spl9_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f185,f208,f218]) ).

fof(f218,plain,
    ( spl9_5
  <=> neq(sK0,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_5])]) ).

fof(f208,plain,
    ( spl9_3
  <=> neq(sK1,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_3])]) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
    | neq(sK0,nil) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f153,f159,f157]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    sK2 = sK0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
              & ? [X3] :
                  ( X1 = X3
                  & ( ~ frontsegP(X1,X0)
                    | ~ neq(X0,nil) )
                  & ( nil != X3
                    | nil = X2 )
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ssList(X3)
                  & ( ( neq(X2,nil)
                      & frontsegP(X3,X2) )
                    | ~ neq(X3,nil) ) ) ) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f110]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( neq(X1,nil)
                  & ( ~ frontsegP(X1,X0)
                    | ~ neq(X0,nil) )
                  & ( ( neq(X2,nil)
                      & frontsegP(X3,X2) )
                    | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
                  & ( nil != X3
                    | nil = X2 )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                      | ( frontsegP(X1,X0)
                        & neq(X0,nil) )
                      | ( neq(X3,nil)
                        & ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                          | ~ frontsegP(X3,X2) ) )
                      | ( nil != X2
                        & nil = X3 )
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                    | ( frontsegP(X1,X0)
                      & neq(X0,nil) )
                    | ( neq(X3,nil)
                      & ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                        | ~ frontsegP(X3,X2) ) )
                    | ( nil != X2
                      & nil = X3 )
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    sK3 = sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | neq(sK2,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ( ~ spl9_5
    | ~ spl9_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f154,f212,f218]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    ( spl9_4
  <=> frontsegP(sK1,sK0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_4])]) ).

fof(f154,plain,
    ( ~ frontsegP(sK1,sK0)
    | ~ neq(sK0,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).

fof(f216,plain,
    spl9_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f158,f208]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    neq(sK1,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).

fof(f215,plain,
    ( ~ spl9_3
    | spl9_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f186,f212,f208]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ( frontsegP(sK1,sK0)
    | ~ neq(sK1,nil) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f152,f159,f159,f157]) ).

fof(f152,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | frontsegP(sK3,sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : SWC103+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 18:30:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.44  % (29285)dis+10_1:1_newcnf=on:sgt=8:sos=on:ss=axioms:to=lpo:urr=on:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.19/0.45  % (29277)dis+1002_1:12_drc=off:fd=preordered:tgt=full:i=99978:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99978Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (29285)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (29274)Success in time 0.121 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------