TSTP Solution File: SWC102-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWC102-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:56:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.39s 0.58s
% Output   : Refutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   4 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    1 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause61,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X)
    | frontsegP(X,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause61) ).

cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    sk4 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(190,plain,
    sk2 = sk1,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_7,co1_6,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(192,plain,
    neq(sk1,nil),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_8,190,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk1,nil)
    | ~ frontsegP(sk2,sk1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(194,plain,
    ~ frontsegP(sk1,sk1),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_9,190,192,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(356,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause61,co1_1,194]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWC102-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 20:44:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  "."
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-11T20:44:09
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n029.cluster.edu at 2022-06-11T20:44:09
% 0.39/0.58  
% 0.39/0.58  
% 0.39/0.58  #||
% 0.39/0.58  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.58  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.58  ||#
% 0.39/0.58  
% 0.39/0.58  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.39/0.58  ;       588 formulas have been input or derived (from 68 formulas).
% 0.39/0.58  ;       356 (61%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.39/0.58  ;            7 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.39/0.58  ;          349 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.39/0.58  ; 
% 0.39/0.58  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.036  34%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.005   5%   Assert                       (194 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.013  12%   Process new row              (525 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.003   3%   Resolution                   (134 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (67 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.008   8%   Condensing                   (130 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.003   3%   Forward subsumption          (130 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.002   2%   Backward subsumption         (128 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.001   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (59 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.007   7%   Forward simplification       (525 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.003   3%   Backward simplification      (353 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (16 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.001   1%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.023  22%   Other
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.105        Total
% 0.39/0.58  ;     0.107        Real time
% 0.39/0.58  ; 
% 0.39/0.59  ; Term-hash-array has 513 terms in all.
% 0.39/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 128 entries (128 at peak, 128 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.39/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 554 nodes (554 at peak, 554 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.39/0.59  ;  Retrieved 48 possibly forward subsuming rows in 130 calls.
% 0.39/0.59  ;  Retrieved 12 possibly backward subsumed rows in 128 calls.
% 0.41/0.59  ; Path-index has 516 entries (516 at peak, 521 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.41/0.59  ; Path-index has 1,338 nodes (1,338 at peak, 1,343 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.41/0.59  ; Trie-index has 516 entries (516 at peak, 521 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.41/0.59  ; Trie-index has 1,331 nodes (1,331 at peak, 1,336 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.41/0.59  ; Retrieved 168 generalization terms in 801 calls.
% 0.41/0.59  ; Retrieved 224 instance terms in 224 calls.
% 0.41/0.59  ; Retrieved 1,994 unifiable terms in 454 calls.
% 0.41/0.59  ; 
% 0.41/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to process has 59 entries:
% 0.41/0.59  ;     1 with value 4              42 with value 8               12 with value 10
% 0.41/0.59  ;     4 with value 5
% 0.41/0.59  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 121 entries:
% 0.41/0.59  ;     3 with value 7               4 with value 17               3 with value 26
% 0.41/0.59  ;     8 with value 9               7 with value 18               6 with value 27
% 0.41/0.59  ;     2 with value 10              2 with value 19               1 with value 29
% 0.41/0.59  ;     6 with value 11             11 with value 20               1 with value 32
% 0.41/0.59  ;     4 with value 12              9 with value 21               1 with value 33
% 0.41/0.59  ;    11 with value 13              5 with value 22               1 with value 35
% 0.41/0.59  ;    12 with value 14              2 with value 23               2 with value 40
% 0.41/0.59  ;     3 with value 15              3 with value 24               3 with value 44
% 0.41/0.59  ;     3 with value 16              8 with value 25
% 0.41/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to give has 160 entries:
% 0.41/0.59  ;    10 with value (4 5)          75 with value (4 8)           12 with value (4 10)
% 0.41/0.59  ;    63 with value (4 7)
% 0.41/0.59  Evaluation took:
% 0.41/0.59    0.107 seconds of real time
% 0.41/0.59    0.094911 seconds of user run time
% 0.41/0.59    0.012052 seconds of system run time
% 0.41/0.59    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.41/0.59    0 page faults and
% 0.41/0.59    5,752,960 bytes consed.
% 0.41/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.41/0.59  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-11T20:44:09
% 0.41/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.41/0.59  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------