TSTP Solution File: SWC102-1 by Gandalf---c-2.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem : SWC102-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality:r
% Format : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 unknown
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 1000MB
% OS : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s
% Result : Unsatisfiable 10.0s
% Output : Assurance 10.0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
%
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SWC/SWC102-1+eq_r.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
%
% prove-all-passes started
%
% detected problem class: neq
% detected subclass: big
%
% strategies selected:
% (hyper 28 #f 5 19)
% (binary-unit 28 #f 5 19)
% (binary-double 11 #f 5 19)
% (binary-double 17 #f)
% (binary-double 17 #t)
% (binary 87 #t 5 19)
% (binary-order 28 #f 5 19)
% (binary-posweight-order 58 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 28 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 11 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 28 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder-sos 17 #f)
% (binary-order 28 #f)
% (hyper-order 17 #f)
% (binary 141 #t)
%
%
% SOS clause
% -neq(sk1,nil) | -frontseg^p(sk2,sk1).
% was split for some strategies as:
% -neq(sk1,nil).
% -frontseg^p(sk2,sk1).
%
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
%
%
% timer checkpoints: c(195,40,1,390,0,1,34455,4,1140,35835,5,1302,35836,1,1303,35836,50,1304,35836,40,1304,36031,0,1316)
%
%
% START OF PROOF
% 396 [?] ?
% 36027 [] equal(sk2,sk4).
% 36028 [] equal(sk1,sk3).
% 36029 [] equal(sk4,sk3).
% 36030 [] neq(sk2,nil).
% 36031 [] -neq(sk1,nil) | -frontseg^p(sk2,sk1).
% 36798 [para:36029.1.1,36027.1.2] equal(sk2,sk3).
% 36799 [para:36798.1.2,36028.1.2] equal(sk1,sk2).
% 36802 [para:36799.1.2,36030.1.1] neq(sk1,nil).
% 36803 [para:36799.1.2,36031.2.1,cut:396,cut:36802] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
%
% Proof found by the following strategy:
%
% using binary resolution
% not using sos strategy
% using unit strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% using clause demodulation
% clause length limited to 19
% clause depth limited to 5
% seconds given: 13
%
%
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
%
% Global statistics over all passes:
%
% given clauses: 91
% derived clauses: 48180
% kept clauses: 24337
% kept size sum: 345263
% kept mid-nuclei: 11300
% kept new demods: 18587
% forw unit-subs: 2785
% forw double-subs: 1493
% forw overdouble-subs: 431
% backward subs: 0
% fast unit cutoff: 793
% full unit cutoff: 0
% dbl unit cutoff: 136
% real runtime : 13.20
% process. runtime: 13.19
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics:
% tried: 41303
% length fails: 221
% strength fails: 15412
% predlist fails: 3045
% aux str. fails: 1644
% by-lit fails: 734
% full subs tried: 19449
% full subs fail: 18703
%
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SWC/SWC102-1+eq_r.in")
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------