TSTP Solution File: SWC102+1 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : SWC102+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:47:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 14.45s 14.69s
% Output   : Refutation 14.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named eq_axiom)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ! [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                 => ( V != X
                    | U != W
                    | X != W
                    | ~ neq(V,nil)
                    | ( neq(U,nil)
                      & frontsegP(V,U) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    input ).

fof(c23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U] :
        ( ssList(U)
       => ! [V] :
            ( ssList(V)
           => ! [W] :
                ( ssList(W)
               => ! [X] :
                    ( ssList(X)
                   => ( V != X
                      | U != W
                      | X != W
                      | ~ neq(V,nil)
                      | ( neq(U,nil)
                        & frontsegP(V,U) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[co1]) ).

fof(c24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U] :
        ( ssList(U)
       => ! [V] :
            ( ssList(V)
           => ! [W] :
                ( ssList(W)
               => ! [X] :
                    ( ssList(X)
                   => ( V != X
                      | U != W
                      | X != W
                      | ~ neq(V,nil)
                      | ( neq(U,nil)
                        & frontsegP(V,U) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[c23]) ).

fof(c25,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
      & ? [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
          & ? [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
              & ? [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                  & V = X
                  & U = W
                  & X = W
                  & neq(V,nil)
                  & ( ~ neq(U,nil)
                    | ~ frontsegP(V,U) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c24]) ).

fof(c26,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X2] :
      ( ssList(X2)
      & ? [X3] :
          ( ssList(X3)
          & ? [X4] :
              ( ssList(X4)
              & ? [X5] :
                  ( ssList(X5)
                  & X3 = X5
                  & X2 = X4
                  & X5 = X4
                  & neq(X3,nil)
                  & ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                    | ~ frontsegP(X3,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c25]) ).

fof(c27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(skolem0001)
    & ssList(skolem0002)
    & ssList(skolem0003)
    & ssList(skolem0004)
    & skolem0002 = skolem0004
    & skolem0001 = skolem0003
    & skolem0004 = skolem0003
    & neq(skolem0002,nil)
    & ( ~ neq(skolem0001,nil)
      | ~ frontsegP(skolem0002,skolem0001) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c26]) ).

cnf(c32,negated_conjecture,
    skolem0002 = skolem0004,
    inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c27]) ).

cnf(transitivity,axiom,
    ( X254 != X255
    | X255 != X253
    | X254 = X253 ),
    eq_axiom ).

cnf(c34,negated_conjecture,
    skolem0004 = skolem0003,
    inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c27]) ).

cnf(c515,plain,
    ( X378 != skolem0004
    | X378 = skolem0003 ),
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c34,transitivity]) ).

cnf(c715,plain,
    skolem0002 = skolem0003,
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c515,c32]) ).

cnf(symmetry,axiom,
    ( X251 != X252
    | X252 = X251 ),
    eq_axiom ).

cnf(c33,negated_conjecture,
    skolem0001 = skolem0003,
    inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c27]) ).

cnf(c514,plain,
    skolem0003 = skolem0001,
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c33,symmetry]) ).

cnf(c526,plain,
    ( X391 != skolem0003
    | X391 = skolem0001 ),
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c514,transitivity]) ).

cnf(c771,plain,
    skolem0002 = skolem0001,
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c526,c715]) ).

cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
    X250 = X250,
    eq_axiom ).

cnf(c35,negated_conjecture,
    neq(skolem0002,nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c27]) ).

cnf(c5,plain,
    ( X279 != X277
    | X276 != X278
    | ~ neq(X279,X276)
    | neq(X277,X278) ),
    eq_axiom ).

cnf(c567,plain,
    ( skolem0002 != X732
    | nil != X733
    | neq(X732,X733) ),
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c5,c35]) ).

cnf(c21953,plain,
    ( skolem0002 != X858
    | neq(X858,nil) ),
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c567,reflexivity]) ).

cnf(c39947,plain,
    neq(skolem0001,nil),
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c21953,c771]) ).

cnf(c36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(skolem0001,nil)
    | ~ frontsegP(skolem0002,skolem0001) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c27]) ).

cnf(c727,plain,
    skolem0003 = skolem0002,
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c715,symmetry]) ).

cnf(c30,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(skolem0003),
    inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c27]) ).

fof(ax42,axiom,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => frontsegP(U,U) ),
    input ).

fof(c240,axiom,
    ! [U] :
      ( ~ ssList(U)
      | frontsegP(U,U) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[ax42]) ).

fof(c241,axiom,
    ! [X93] :
      ( ~ ssList(X93)
      | frontsegP(X93,X93) ),
    inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c240]) ).

cnf(c242,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X283)
    | frontsegP(X283,X283) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c241]) ).

cnf(c579,plain,
    frontsegP(skolem0003,skolem0003),
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c242,c30]) ).

cnf(c9,plain,
    ( X296 != X294
    | X293 != X295
    | ~ frontsegP(X296,X293)
    | frontsegP(X294,X295) ),
    eq_axiom ).

cnf(c594,plain,
    ( skolem0003 != X734
    | skolem0003 != X735
    | frontsegP(X734,X735) ),
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c9,c579]) ).

cnf(c21978,plain,
    ( skolem0003 != X860
    | frontsegP(X860,skolem0001) ),
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c594,c514]) ).

cnf(c40099,plain,
    frontsegP(skolem0002,skolem0001),
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c21978,c727]) ).

cnf(c40110,plain,
    ~ neq(skolem0001,nil),
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c40099,c36]) ).

cnf(c40269,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,status(thm),[c40110,c39947]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SWC102+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:31:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 14.45/14.69  # Version:  1.3
% 14.45/14.69  # SZS status Theorem
% 14.45/14.69  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.45/14.69  
% 14.45/14.69  # Initial clauses    : 225
% 14.45/14.69  # Processed clauses  : 1224
% 14.45/14.69  # Factors computed   : 0
% 14.45/14.69  # Resolvents computed: 39764
% 14.45/14.69  # Tautologies deleted: 15
% 14.45/14.69  # Forward subsumed   : 772
% 14.45/14.69  # Backward subsumed  : 1
% 14.45/14.69  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 14.45/14.69  # User time          : 14.250 s
% 14.45/14.69  # System time        : 0.078 s
% 14.45/14.69  # Total time         : 14.328 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------