TSTP Solution File: SWC102+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : SWC102+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:49:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 27.45s 4.55s
% Output : Proof 39.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWC102+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 16:40:44 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.62 ________ _____
% 0.21/0.62 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.62 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.21/0.62 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.21/0.62 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.62
% 0.21/0.62 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.62 (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.62
% 0.21/0.62 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.62 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.62 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.62 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.62
% 0.21/0.62 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.62
% 0.21/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.64 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.67 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.67 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.67 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.67 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.67 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.67 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.67 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 7.56/1.86 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 7.56/1.93 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 7.56/1.97 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 7.56/1.97 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 7.56/1.97 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 7.56/1.98 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 7.56/1.98 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 21.29/3.74 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 21.29/3.77 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.04/3.80 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.04/3.84 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 23.46/3.99 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 27.38/4.49 Prover 6: proved (3821ms)
% 27.45/4.54
% 27.45/4.55 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 27.45/4.55
% 27.45/4.55 Prover 5: stopped
% 27.45/4.55 Prover 3: stopped
% 27.45/4.56 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 27.45/4.56 Prover 2: stopped
% 27.45/4.57 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 27.45/4.57 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 27.45/4.58 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 29.76/4.84 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 29.76/4.89 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 30.47/4.94 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 30.47/4.97 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 31.11/5.07 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 32.29/5.23 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 32.29/5.25 Prover 0: stopped
% 32.29/5.26 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 33.34/5.32 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 34.34/5.46 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 34.34/5.47 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 34.34/5.48 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 35.03/5.54 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 35.66/5.66 Prover 1: Found proof (size 16)
% 35.66/5.66 Prover 1: proved (5003ms)
% 35.66/5.66 Prover 4: stopped
% 35.66/5.66 Prover 7: stopped
% 35.66/5.66 Prover 8: stopped
% 35.66/5.66 Prover 10: stopped
% 35.66/5.66 Prover 13: stopped
% 39.12/6.44 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 39.63/6.50 Prover 11: stopped
% 39.63/6.50
% 39.63/6.50 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 39.63/6.50
% 39.63/6.50 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 39.63/6.51 Assumptions after simplification:
% 39.63/6.51 ---------------------------------
% 39.63/6.51
% 39.63/6.51 (ax42)
% 39.63/6.55 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (frontsegP(v0, v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0)
% 39.63/6.56 | ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & ssList(v0) = v2))
% 39.63/6.56
% 39.63/6.56 (co1)
% 39.63/6.56 $i(nil) & ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: any] : (ssList(v0) = 0 & neq(v0, nil) = v1 &
% 39.63/6.56 $i(v0) & ? [v2: int] : (v1 = 0 & ~ (v2 = 0) & frontsegP(v0, v0) = v2))
% 39.63/6.56
% 39.63/6.56 (function-axioms)
% 39.92/6.58 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 39.92/6.58 [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (gt(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (gt(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0:
% 39.92/6.58 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i]
% 39.92/6.58 : (v1 = v0 | ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0:
% 39.92/6.58 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i]
% 39.92/6.58 : (v1 = v0 | ~ (lt(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (lt(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0:
% 39.92/6.58 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i]
% 39.92/6.58 : (v1 = v0 | ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0:
% 39.92/6.58 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i]
% 39.92/6.58 : (v1 = v0 | ~ (segmentP(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (segmentP(v3, v2) = v0)) & !
% 39.92/6.58 [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3:
% 39.92/6.58 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rearsegP(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (rearsegP(v3, v2) = v0)) &
% 39.92/6.58 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3:
% 39.92/6.58 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (frontsegP(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (frontsegP(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.92/6.58 & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 39.92/6.58 [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (memberP(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (memberP(v3, v2) = v0)) &
% 39.92/6.58 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 39.92/6.58 (cons(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (cons(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] :
% 39.92/6.58 ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (app(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (app(v3, v2)
% 39.92/6.58 = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2:
% 39.92/6.59 $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (neq(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (neq(v3, v2) =
% 39.92/6.59 v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tl(v2) =
% 39.92/6.59 v1) | ~ (tl(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 39.92/6.59 v0 | ~ (hd(v2) = v1) | ~ (hd(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 39.92/6.59 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (equalelemsP(v2) = v1) |
% 39.92/6.59 ~ (equalelemsP(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 39.92/6.59 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (duplicatefreeP(v2) = v1) |
% 39.92/6.59 ~ (duplicatefreeP(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 39.92/6.59 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (strictorderedP(v2) = v1) |
% 39.92/6.59 ~ (strictorderedP(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 39.92/6.59 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (totalorderedP(v2) = v1) |
% 39.92/6.59 ~ (totalorderedP(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 39.92/6.59 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (strictorderP(v2) = v1) |
% 39.92/6.59 ~ (strictorderP(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 39.92/6.59 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (totalorderP(v2) = v1) | ~
% 39.92/6.59 (totalorderP(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 39.92/6.59 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (cyclefreeP(v2) = v1) | ~
% 39.92/6.59 (cyclefreeP(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 39.92/6.59 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (singletonP(v2) = v1) | ~
% 39.92/6.59 (singletonP(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 39.92/6.59 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (ssList(v2) = v1) | ~
% 39.92/6.59 (ssList(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool]
% 39.92/6.59 : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (ssItem(v2) = v1) | ~ (ssItem(v2) = v0))
% 39.92/6.59
% 39.92/6.59 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 39.92/6.59 --------------------------------------------
% 39.92/6.59 ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20,
% 39.92/6.59 ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32,
% 39.92/6.59 ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax43, ax44, ax45,
% 39.92/6.59 ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56, ax57,
% 39.92/6.59 ax58, ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68, ax69,
% 39.92/6.59 ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8, ax80,
% 39.92/6.59 ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91, ax92,
% 39.92/6.59 ax93, ax94, ax95
% 39.92/6.59
% 39.92/6.59 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 39.92/6.59 ---------------------------------
% 39.92/6.59
% 39.92/6.59 Begin of proof
% 39.92/6.59 |
% 39.92/6.59 | ALPHA: (co1) implies:
% 39.92/6.59 | (1) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: any] : (ssList(v0) = 0 & neq(v0, nil) = v1 &
% 39.92/6.59 | $i(v0) & ? [v2: int] : (v1 = 0 & ~ (v2 = 0) & frontsegP(v0, v0) =
% 39.92/6.59 | v2))
% 39.92/6.59 |
% 39.92/6.59 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 39.92/6.59 | (2) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 39.92/6.59 | (v1 = v0 | ~ (ssList(v2) = v1) | ~ (ssList(v2) = v0))
% 39.92/6.59 |
% 39.92/6.59 | DELTA: instantiating (1) with fresh symbols all_93_0, all_93_1 gives:
% 39.92/6.60 | (3) ssList(all_93_1) = 0 & neq(all_93_1, nil) = all_93_0 & $i(all_93_1) &
% 39.92/6.60 | ? [v0: int] : (all_93_0 = 0 & ~ (v0 = 0) & frontsegP(all_93_1,
% 39.92/6.60 | all_93_1) = v0)
% 39.92/6.60 |
% 39.92/6.60 | ALPHA: (3) implies:
% 39.92/6.60 | (4) $i(all_93_1)
% 39.92/6.60 | (5) ssList(all_93_1) = 0
% 39.92/6.60 | (6) ? [v0: int] : (all_93_0 = 0 & ~ (v0 = 0) & frontsegP(all_93_1,
% 39.92/6.60 | all_93_1) = v0)
% 39.92/6.60 |
% 39.92/6.60 | DELTA: instantiating (6) with fresh symbol all_97_0 gives:
% 39.92/6.60 | (7) all_93_0 = 0 & ~ (all_97_0 = 0) & frontsegP(all_93_1, all_93_1) =
% 39.92/6.60 | all_97_0
% 39.92/6.60 |
% 39.92/6.60 | ALPHA: (7) implies:
% 39.92/6.60 | (8) ~ (all_97_0 = 0)
% 39.92/6.60 | (9) frontsegP(all_93_1, all_93_1) = all_97_0
% 39.92/6.60 |
% 39.92/6.60 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax42) with all_93_1, all_97_0, simplifying with
% 39.92/6.60 | (4), (9) gives:
% 39.92/6.60 | (10) all_97_0 = 0 | ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & ssList(all_93_1) = v0)
% 39.92/6.60 |
% 39.92/6.60 | BETA: splitting (10) gives:
% 39.92/6.60 |
% 39.92/6.60 | Case 1:
% 39.92/6.60 | |
% 39.92/6.60 | | (11) all_97_0 = 0
% 39.92/6.60 | |
% 39.92/6.60 | | REDUCE: (8), (11) imply:
% 39.92/6.60 | | (12) $false
% 39.92/6.61 | |
% 39.92/6.61 | | CLOSE: (12) is inconsistent.
% 39.92/6.61 | |
% 39.92/6.61 | Case 2:
% 39.92/6.61 | |
% 39.92/6.61 | | (13) ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & ssList(all_93_1) = v0)
% 39.92/6.61 | |
% 39.92/6.61 | | DELTA: instantiating (13) with fresh symbol all_245_0 gives:
% 39.92/6.61 | | (14) ~ (all_245_0 = 0) & ssList(all_93_1) = all_245_0
% 39.92/6.61 | |
% 39.92/6.61 | | ALPHA: (14) implies:
% 39.92/6.61 | | (15) ~ (all_245_0 = 0)
% 39.92/6.61 | | (16) ssList(all_93_1) = all_245_0
% 39.92/6.61 | |
% 39.92/6.61 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with 0, all_245_0, all_93_1, simplifying with
% 39.92/6.61 | | (5), (16) gives:
% 39.92/6.61 | | (17) all_245_0 = 0
% 39.92/6.61 | |
% 39.92/6.61 | | REDUCE: (15), (17) imply:
% 39.92/6.61 | | (18) $false
% 39.92/6.61 | |
% 39.92/6.61 | | CLOSE: (18) is inconsistent.
% 39.92/6.61 | |
% 39.92/6.61 | End of split
% 39.92/6.61 |
% 39.92/6.61 End of proof
% 39.92/6.61 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 39.92/6.61
% 39.92/6.61 5992ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------