TSTP Solution File: SWC102+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWC102+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:39:21 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 47 ( 16 ~; 12 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn; 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| X4 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| ( neq(X1,nil)
& frontsegP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Schd6dQAxp/E---3.1_12883.p',co1) ).
fof(ax42,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> frontsegP(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Schd6dQAxp/E---3.1_12883.p',ax42) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| X4 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| ( neq(X1,nil)
& frontsegP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& esk4_0 = esk3_0
& neq(esk2_0,nil)
& ( ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
| ~ frontsegP(esk2_0,esk1_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk2_0,nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk1_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
| ~ frontsegP(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk1_0,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X20] :
( ~ ssList(X20)
| frontsegP(X20,X20) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax42])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ frontsegP(esk1_0,esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( frontsegP(X1,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.15 % Problem : SWC102+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.14/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.37 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.17/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:03:09 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Schd6dQAxp/E---3.1_12883.p
% 0.24/0.55 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # new_bool_3 with pid 12962 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.55 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with pid 12965 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.55 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.24/0.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.24/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 69
% 0.24/0.55 # Initial clauses : 49
% 0.24/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 49
% 0.24/0.55 # Processed clauses : 73
% 0.24/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.24/0.55 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 70
% 0.24/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 0.24/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Generated clauses : 7
% 0.24/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.24/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 0.24/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 16
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.24/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.24/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.24/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.24/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 118
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 47
% 0.24/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 338
% 0.24/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 73
% 0.24/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4371
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.24/0.55 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.24/0.55 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1796 pages
% 0.24/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.24/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------