TSTP Solution File: SWC101+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SWC101+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2006MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 07:08:37 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.51s
% Output   : Solution 1.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29611/SWC101+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29611/SWC101+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29611/SWC101+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 29743
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.031 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>(frontsegP(X1,X2)<=>?[X3]:(ssList(X3)&app(X2,X3)=X1)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax5)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>(neq(X1,X2)<=>~(X1=X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax15)).
% fof(7, axiom,ssList(nil),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax17)).
% fof(96, conjecture,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|![X5]:(ssList(X5)=>((~(app(X3,X5)=X4)|~(equalelemsP(X3)))|?[X6]:(ssItem(X6)&?[X7]:((ssList(X7)&app(cons(X6,nil),X7)=X5)&?[X8]:(ssList(X8)&app(X8,cons(X6,nil))=X3))))))|(~(nil=X4)&nil=X3))|(nil=X2&nil=X1))|(neq(X1,nil)&frontsegP(X2,X1))))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', co1)).
% fof(97, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|![X5]:(ssList(X5)=>((~(app(X3,X5)=X4)|~(equalelemsP(X3)))|?[X6]:(ssItem(X6)&?[X7]:((ssList(X7)&app(cons(X6,nil),X7)=X5)&?[X8]:(ssList(X8)&app(X8,cons(X6,nil))=X3))))))|(~(nil=X4)&nil=X3))|(nil=X2&nil=X1))|(neq(X1,nil)&frontsegP(X2,X1)))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[96])).
% fof(103, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|![X5]:(ssList(X5)=>((~(app(X3,X5)=X4)|~(equalelemsP(X3)))|?[X6]:(ssItem(X6)&?[X7]:((ssList(X7)&app(cons(X6,nil),X7)=X5)&?[X8]:(ssList(X8)&app(X8,cons(X6,nil))=X3))))))|(~(nil=X4)&nil=X3))|(nil=X2&nil=X1))|(neq(X1,nil)&frontsegP(X2,X1)))))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[97,theory(equality)])).
% fof(115, plain,![X1]:(~(ssList(X1))|![X2]:(~(ssList(X2))|((~(frontsegP(X1,X2))|?[X3]:(ssList(X3)&app(X2,X3)=X1))&(![X3]:(~(ssList(X3))|~(app(X2,X3)=X1))|frontsegP(X1,X2))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(116, plain,![X4]:(~(ssList(X4))|![X5]:(~(ssList(X5))|((~(frontsegP(X4,X5))|?[X6]:(ssList(X6)&app(X5,X6)=X4))&(![X7]:(~(ssList(X7))|~(app(X5,X7)=X4))|frontsegP(X4,X5))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[115])).
% fof(117, plain,![X4]:(~(ssList(X4))|![X5]:(~(ssList(X5))|((~(frontsegP(X4,X5))|(ssList(esk3_2(X4,X5))&app(X5,esk3_2(X4,X5))=X4))&(![X7]:(~(ssList(X7))|~(app(X5,X7)=X4))|frontsegP(X4,X5))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[116])).
% fof(118, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X7]:(((((~(ssList(X7))|~(app(X5,X7)=X4))|frontsegP(X4,X5))&(~(frontsegP(X4,X5))|(ssList(esk3_2(X4,X5))&app(X5,esk3_2(X4,X5))=X4)))|~(ssList(X5)))|~(ssList(X4))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[117])).
% fof(119, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X7]:(((((~(ssList(X7))|~(app(X5,X7)=X4))|frontsegP(X4,X5))|~(ssList(X5)))|~(ssList(X4)))&((((ssList(esk3_2(X4,X5))|~(frontsegP(X4,X5)))|~(ssList(X5)))|~(ssList(X4)))&(((app(X5,esk3_2(X4,X5))=X4|~(frontsegP(X4,X5)))|~(ssList(X5)))|~(ssList(X4))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[118])).
% cnf(122,plain,(frontsegP(X1,X2)|~ssList(X1)|~ssList(X2)|app(X2,X3)!=X1|~ssList(X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[119])).
% fof(135, plain,![X1]:(~(ssList(X1))|![X2]:(~(ssList(X2))|((~(neq(X1,X2))|~(X1=X2))&(X1=X2|neq(X1,X2))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5])).
% fof(136, plain,![X3]:(~(ssList(X3))|![X4]:(~(ssList(X4))|((~(neq(X3,X4))|~(X3=X4))&(X3=X4|neq(X3,X4))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[135])).
% fof(137, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(ssList(X4))|((~(neq(X3,X4))|~(X3=X4))&(X3=X4|neq(X3,X4))))|~(ssList(X3))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[136])).
% fof(138, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((((~(neq(X3,X4))|~(X3=X4))|~(ssList(X4)))|~(ssList(X3)))&(((X3=X4|neq(X3,X4))|~(ssList(X4)))|~(ssList(X3)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[137])).
% cnf(139,plain,(neq(X1,X2)|X1=X2|~ssList(X1)|~ssList(X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[138])).
% cnf(145,plain,(ssList(nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[7])).
% fof(568, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:(ssList(X1)&?[X2]:(ssList(X2)&?[X3]:(ssList(X3)&?[X4]:(ssList(X4)&(((((X2=X4&X1=X3)&?[X5]:(ssList(X5)&((app(X3,X5)=X4&equalelemsP(X3))&![X6]:(~(ssItem(X6))|![X7]:((~(ssList(X7))|~(app(cons(X6,nil),X7)=X5))|![X8]:(~(ssList(X8))|~(app(X8,cons(X6,nil))=X3)))))))&(nil=X4|~(nil=X3)))&(~(nil=X2)|~(nil=X1)))&(~(neq(X1,nil))|~(frontsegP(X2,X1)))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[103])).
% fof(569, negated_conjecture,?[X9]:(ssList(X9)&?[X10]:(ssList(X10)&?[X11]:(ssList(X11)&?[X12]:(ssList(X12)&(((((X10=X12&X9=X11)&?[X13]:(ssList(X13)&((app(X11,X13)=X12&equalelemsP(X11))&![X14]:(~(ssItem(X14))|![X15]:((~(ssList(X15))|~(app(cons(X14,nil),X15)=X13))|![X16]:(~(ssList(X16))|~(app(X16,cons(X14,nil))=X11)))))))&(nil=X12|~(nil=X11)))&(~(nil=X10)|~(nil=X9)))&(~(neq(X9,nil))|~(frontsegP(X10,X9)))))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[568])).
% fof(570, negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk48_0)&(ssList(esk49_0)&(ssList(esk50_0)&(ssList(esk51_0)&(((((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&(ssList(esk52_0)&((app(esk50_0,esk52_0)=esk51_0&equalelemsP(esk50_0))&![X14]:(~(ssItem(X14))|![X15]:((~(ssList(X15))|~(app(cons(X14,nil),X15)=esk52_0))|![X16]:(~(ssList(X16))|~(app(X16,cons(X14,nil))=esk50_0)))))))&(nil=esk51_0|~(nil=esk50_0)))&(~(nil=esk49_0)|~(nil=esk48_0)))&(~(neq(esk48_0,nil))|~(frontsegP(esk49_0,esk48_0)))))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[569])).
% fof(571, negated_conjecture,![X14]:![X15]:![X16]:(((((((((((((~(ssList(X16))|~(app(X16,cons(X14,nil))=esk50_0))|(~(ssList(X15))|~(app(cons(X14,nil),X15)=esk52_0)))|~(ssItem(X14)))&(app(esk50_0,esk52_0)=esk51_0&equalelemsP(esk50_0)))&ssList(esk52_0))&(esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0))&(nil=esk51_0|~(nil=esk50_0)))&(~(nil=esk49_0)|~(nil=esk48_0)))&(~(neq(esk48_0,nil))|~(frontsegP(esk49_0,esk48_0))))&ssList(esk51_0))&ssList(esk50_0))&ssList(esk49_0))&ssList(esk48_0)),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[570])).
% cnf(572,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk48_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(573,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk49_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(576,negated_conjecture,(~frontsegP(esk49_0,esk48_0)|~neq(esk48_0,nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(577,negated_conjecture,(nil!=esk48_0|nil!=esk49_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(578,negated_conjecture,(nil=esk51_0|nil!=esk50_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(579,negated_conjecture,(esk48_0=esk50_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(580,negated_conjecture,(esk49_0=esk51_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(581,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk52_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(583,negated_conjecture,(app(esk50_0,esk52_0)=esk51_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(585,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0!=nil|esk49_0!=nil),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[577,579,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(586,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0!=nil|esk51_0!=nil),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[585,580,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(587,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk50_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[572,579,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(588,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk51_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[573,580,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(591,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0!=nil),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[578,586])).
% cnf(592,negated_conjecture,(~neq(esk50_0,nil)|~frontsegP(esk49_0,esk48_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[576,579,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(593,negated_conjecture,(~neq(esk50_0,nil)|~frontsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[592,580,theory(equality)]),579,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(693,negated_conjecture,(frontsegP(X1,esk50_0)|esk51_0!=X1|~ssList(esk52_0)|~ssList(esk50_0)|~ssList(X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[122,583,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(697,negated_conjecture,(frontsegP(X1,esk50_0)|esk51_0!=X1|$false|~ssList(esk50_0)|~ssList(X1)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[693,581,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(698,negated_conjecture,(frontsegP(X1,esk50_0)|esk51_0!=X1|$false|$false|~ssList(X1)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[697,587,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(699,negated_conjecture,(frontsegP(X1,esk50_0)|esk51_0!=X1|~ssList(X1)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[698,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1851,negated_conjecture,(frontsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)|~ssList(esk51_0)),inference(er,[status(thm)],[699,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1852,negated_conjecture,(frontsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1851,588,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1853,negated_conjecture,(frontsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1852,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1859,negated_conjecture,($false|~neq(esk50_0,nil)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[593,1853,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1860,negated_conjecture,(~neq(esk50_0,nil)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1859,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1881,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0=nil|~ssList(nil)|~ssList(esk50_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1860,139,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1883,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0=nil|$false|~ssList(esk50_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1881,145,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1884,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0=nil|$false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1883,587,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1885,negated_conjecture,(esk50_0=nil),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1884,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1886,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1885,591,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1887,negated_conjecture,($false),1886,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 254
% # ...of these trivial                : 2
% # ...subsumed                        : 13
% # ...remaining for further processing: 239
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 69
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 12
% # Generated clauses                  : 708
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 587
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 3
% # Paramodulations                    : 615
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 93
% # Current number of processed clauses: 221
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 30
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 6
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 185
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 473
% # ...number of literals in the above : 3309
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 897
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 199
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 7
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 7
% # Backwards rewriting index:   252 leaves,   1.33+/-1.097 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:          114 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:          214 leaves,   1.22+/-0.944 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.070 s
% # System time            : 0.005 s
% # Total time             : 0.075 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.20 CPU 0.27 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.20 CPU 0.27 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29611/SWC101+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------