TSTP Solution File: SWC099-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC099-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:59:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.76s 0.99s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWC099-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:25:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.44 The process was started by sandbox2 on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.44 Sun Jun 12 09:25:27 2022
% 0.19/0.44 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 4281.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.44 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.44 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.44 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.44 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.44 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.44 142 back subsumes 141.
% 0.19/0.44 152 back subsumes 146.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 437 during input processing: 0 [copy,437,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 339.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 283.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 282.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 281.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 271.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 258.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 257.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 256.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 219.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 207.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 206.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 205.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 204.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 187.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 184.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 182.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 178.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 175.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 152.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 151.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 150.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 149.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 148.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 140.
% 0.19/0.44 437 back subsumes 139.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.51 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.51 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.51 number of clauses in intial UL: 337
% 0.19/0.51 number of clauses initially in problem: 400
% 0.19/0.51 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.19/0.51 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.19/0.51 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.51 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.19/0.51 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.19/0.51 distinct function count: 46
% 0.19/0.51 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.99 cons(skac3,app(sk1,nil))=app(cons(skac3,sk1),nil).
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.76/0.99 39 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1245.4 K.
% 0.76/0.99 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.76/0.99 sym_ent ( 304) 180 0 180 0 53.4 K
% 0.76/0.99 term ( 32) 83670 78094 5576 7 174.5 K
% 0.76/0.99 rel ( 40) 61085 55009 6076 3 237.5 K
% 0.76/0.99 term_ptr ( 16) 23557 2241 21316 64 334.1 K
% 0.76/0.99 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.99 fpa_head ( 24) 2185 51 2134 4 50.1 K
% 0.76/0.99 fpa_tree ( 56) 14872 14872 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.76/0.99 context (1288) 19003 19003 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.76/0.99 trail ( 24) 92874 92874 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.76/0.99 imd_tree ( 32) 95 21 74 9 2.6 K
% 0.76/0.99 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.99 is_tree ( 24) 1652 140 1512 40 36.4 K
% 0.76/0.99 is_pos (2424) 59678 59678 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.76/0.99 fsub_pos ( 16) 8507 8507 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.99 literal ( 32) 19322 15720 3602 0 112.6 K
% 0.76/0.99 clause ( 88) 3465 2528 937 0 80.5 K
% 0.76/0.99 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.76/0.99 clash_nd ( 80) 8256 8256 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.76/0.99 clause_ptr ( 16) 893 136 757 4 11.9 K
% 0.76/0.99 int_ptr ( 16) 7703 4248 3455 0 54.0 K
% 0.76/0.99 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.99 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.99 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.99 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.99 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.99 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.99 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.76/0.99 cl time 0.00
% 0.76/0.99 hints time 0.00
% 0.76/0.99 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.76/0.99 conflict time 0.00
% 0.76/0.99 new demod time 0.00
% 0.76/0.99 post_process time 0.00
% 0.76/0.99 back demod time 0.00
% 0.76/0.99 back subsume 0.00
% 0.76/0.99 factor time 0.00
% 0.76/0.99 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.76/0.99 unindex time 0.00
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 true clauses given 1 (14.3%)
% 0.76/0.99 false clauses given 6
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 FALSE TRUE
% 0.76/0.99 2 1 5
% 0.76/0.99 3 40 9
% 0.76/0.99 4 16 7
% 0.76/0.99 5 1 0
% 0.76/0.99 6 2 3
% 0.76/0.99 7 0 17
% 0.76/0.99 9 2 15
% 0.76/0.99 10 0 1
% 0.76/0.99 11 0 26
% 0.76/0.99 12 0 21
% 0.76/0.99 13 0 24
% 0.76/0.99 14 0 5
% 0.76/0.99 15 0 20
% 0.76/0.99 16 0 9
% 0.76/0.99 17 0 10
% 0.76/0.99 19 0 4
% 0.76/0.99 21 0 12
% 0.76/0.99 22 0 8
% 0.76/0.99 23 0 4
% 0.76/0.99 tot: 62 200 (76.3% true)
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.76/0.99 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.76/0.99 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.76/0.99 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.76/0.99 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.76/0.99 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.76/0.99 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.76/0.99 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.76/0.99 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.76/0.99 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.76/0.99 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.76/0.99 All others: 561.
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------