TSTP Solution File: SWC098+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWC098+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:39:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  173 (  75 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   46 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  225 (  87   ~;  90   |;  34   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   26 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn;  18   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ? [X5] :
                        ( ssItem(X5)
                        & cons(X5,nil) = X1
                        & ! [X6] :
                            ( ssItem(X6)
                           => ( ~ memberP(X2,X6)
                              | ~ leq(X5,X6)
                              | X5 = X6 ) )
                        & memberP(X2,X5) )
                    | ( nil = X2
                      & nil = X1 )
                    | ( ! [X7] :
                          ( ssItem(X7)
                         => ( cons(X7,nil) != X3
                            | ~ memberP(X4,X7)
                            | ? [X8] :
                                ( ssItem(X8)
                                & X7 != X8
                                & memberP(X4,X8)
                                & leq(X7,X8) ) ) )
                      & ( nil != X4
                        | nil != X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4U4jB1vA5x/E---3.1_3638.p',co1) ).

fof(ax18,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => cons(X2,X1) != X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4U4jB1vA5x/E---3.1_3638.p',ax18) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4U4jB1vA5x/E---3.1_3638.p',ax17) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ? [X5] :
                          ( ssItem(X5)
                          & cons(X5,nil) = X1
                          & ! [X6] :
                              ( ssItem(X6)
                             => ( ~ memberP(X2,X6)
                                | ~ leq(X5,X6)
                                | X5 = X6 ) )
                          & memberP(X2,X5) )
                      | ( nil = X2
                        & nil = X1 )
                      | ( ! [X7] :
                            ( ssItem(X7)
                           => ( cons(X7,nil) != X3
                              | ~ memberP(X4,X7)
                              | ? [X8] :
                                  ( ssItem(X8)
                                  & X7 != X8
                                  & memberP(X4,X8)
                                  & leq(X7,X8) ) ) )
                        & ( nil != X4
                          | nil != X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X13,X16] :
      ( ssList(esk1_0)
      & ssList(esk2_0)
      & ssList(esk3_0)
      & ssList(esk4_0)
      & esk2_0 = esk4_0
      & esk1_0 = esk3_0
      & ( ssItem(esk5_1(X13))
        | ~ ssItem(X13)
        | cons(X13,nil) != esk1_0
        | ~ memberP(esk2_0,X13) )
      & ( memberP(esk2_0,esk5_1(X13))
        | ~ ssItem(X13)
        | cons(X13,nil) != esk1_0
        | ~ memberP(esk2_0,X13) )
      & ( leq(X13,esk5_1(X13))
        | ~ ssItem(X13)
        | cons(X13,nil) != esk1_0
        | ~ memberP(esk2_0,X13) )
      & ( X13 != esk5_1(X13)
        | ~ ssItem(X13)
        | cons(X13,nil) != esk1_0
        | ~ memberP(esk2_0,X13) )
      & ( nil != esk2_0
        | nil != esk1_0 )
      & ( nil = esk4_0
        | ssItem(esk6_0) )
      & ( nil = esk3_0
        | ssItem(esk6_0) )
      & ( nil = esk4_0
        | cons(esk6_0,nil) = esk3_0 )
      & ( nil = esk3_0
        | cons(esk6_0,nil) = esk3_0 )
      & ( nil = esk4_0
        | memberP(esk4_0,esk6_0) )
      & ( nil = esk3_0
        | memberP(esk4_0,esk6_0) )
      & ( nil = esk4_0
        | ~ ssItem(X16)
        | esk6_0 = X16
        | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X16)
        | ~ leq(esk6_0,X16) )
      & ( nil = esk3_0
        | ~ ssItem(X16)
        | esk6_0 = X16
        | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X16)
        | ~ leq(esk6_0,X16) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X52,X53] :
      ( ~ ssList(X52)
      | ~ ssItem(X53)
      | cons(X53,X52) != X52 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax18])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != esk2_0
    | nil != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | cons(X2,X1) != X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk4_0
    | cons(esk6_0,nil) = esk3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk4_0
    | ssItem(esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 != nil
    | esk4_0 != nil ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk3_0
    | esk6_0 = X1
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ leq(esk6_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 != nil,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(X1,esk5_1(X1))
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != esk1_0
    | ~ memberP(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk3_0
    | cons(esk6_0,nil) = esk3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk3_0
    | memberP(esk4_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk3_0
    | ssItem(esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk6_0 = X1
    | ~ leq(esk6_0,X1)
    | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(X1,esk5_1(X1))
    | cons(X1,nil) != esk3_0
    | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    cons(esk6_0,nil) = esk3_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(esk4_0,esk6_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk6_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(esk2_0,esk5_1(X1))
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != esk1_0
    | ~ memberP(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk5_1(esk6_0) = esk6_0
    | ~ memberP(esk4_0,esk5_1(esk6_0))
    | ~ ssItem(esk5_1(esk6_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(esk4_0,esk5_1(X1))
    | cons(X1,nil) != esk3_0
    | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_8]),c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk5_1(X1))
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != esk1_0
    | ~ memberP(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != esk5_1(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != esk1_0
    | ~ memberP(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk5_1(esk6_0) = esk6_0
    | ~ ssItem(esk5_1(esk6_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk5_1(X1))
    | cons(X1,nil) != esk3_0
    | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(X1,nil) != esk3_0
    | esk5_1(X1) != X1
    | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    esk5_1(esk6_0) = esk6_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SWC098+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:11:22 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4U4jB1vA5x/E---3.1_3638.p
% 0.16/0.44  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # new_bool_3 with pid 3717 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.44  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3720 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.44  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.16/0.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 66
% 0.16/0.44  # Initial clauses                      : 64
% 0.16/0.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 64
% 0.16/0.44  # Processed clauses                    : 136
% 0.16/0.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.16/0.44  # ...subsumed                          : 7
% 0.16/0.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 127
% 0.16/0.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 9
% 0.16/0.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.16/0.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.16/0.44  # Generated clauses                    : 93
% 0.16/0.44  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 72
% 0.16/0.44  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.16/0.44  # Paramodulations                      : 78
% 0.16/0.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 13
% 0.16/0.44  # Total rewrite steps                  : 89
% 0.16/0.44  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 54
% 0.16/0.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
% 0.16/0.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.16/0.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 34
% 0.16/0.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 60
% 0.16/0.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 255
% 0.16/0.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 69
% 0.16/0.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 584
% 0.16/0.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 127
% 0.16/0.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.16/0.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 60
% 0.16/0.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.16/0.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.16/0.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6842
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.16/0.44  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.44  # Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.16/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 2028 pages
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.16/0.44  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.44  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.16/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
% 0.16/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------