TSTP Solution File: SWC097-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWC097-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:41:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 45 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 21 ~; 22 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 7 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f361,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f360,f352]) ).
fof(f352,plain,
~ ssItem(sk5),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f321,f249]) ).
fof(f249,plain,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ~ ssItem(sk5) ),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f198]) ).
fof(f198,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ssItem(sk5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).
fof(f321,plain,
( ~ ssItem(sk5)
| neq(sk4,nil) ),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f205]) ).
fof(f205,plain,
( neq(sk4,nil)
| ssItem(sk5) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f195,f190]) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
fof(f195,axiom,
( ssItem(sk5)
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
fof(f360,plain,
ssItem(sk5),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f359]) ).
fof(f359,plain,
( ssItem(sk5)
| sk4 != sk4 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f356,f357]) ).
fof(f357,plain,
sk4 = app(sk3,cons(sk5,nil)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f199,f346]) ).
fof(f346,plain,
neq(sk4,nil),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f201]) ).
fof(f201,plain,
( neq(sk4,nil)
| neq(sk4,nil) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f192,f190,f190]) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
( neq(sk2,nil)
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f199,axiom,
( sk4 = app(sk3,cons(sk5,nil))
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).
fof(f356,plain,
! [X6] :
( sk4 != app(sk3,cons(X6,nil))
| ssItem(X6) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f252,f338]) ).
fof(f338,plain,
! [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
| sk4 != app(sk3,cons(X6,nil))
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f200]) ).
fof(f200,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| sk4 != app(sk3,cons(X6,nil)) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f197,f190,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f197,axiom,
! [X6] :
( ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| sk2 != app(sk1,cons(X6,nil)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
fof(f252,plain,
! [X6] :
( sk4 != app(sk3,cons(X6,nil))
| neq(sk4,nil)
| ssItem(X6) ),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f206]) ).
fof(f206,plain,
! [X6] :
( sk4 != app(sk3,cons(X6,nil))
| neq(sk4,nil)
| ~ ssItem(X6) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f194,f190,f191,f190]) ).
fof(f194,axiom,
! [X6] :
( sk2 != app(sk1,cons(X6,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWC097-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 17:59:16 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 % (22872)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 0.21/0.49 % (22864)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.21/0.49 % (22856)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (22864)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.51 % (22871)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (22865)ott+10_1:8_bsd=on:fsd=on:lcm=predicate:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=1.5:spb=goal_then_units:i=176:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/176Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (22855)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (22849)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (22864)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51 % (22864)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (22864)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.51 % (22864)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.51 % (22864)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 % (22864)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.21/0.51 % (22864)Time elapsed: 0.113 s
% 0.21/0.51 % (22864)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.21/0.51 % (22864)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (22864)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (22844)Success in time 0.157 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------