TSTP Solution File: SWC097-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWC097-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:41:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 9 unt; 1 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 10 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
( neq(sk2,nil)
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1l1K4OkAze/E---3.1_1784.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_13,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1l1K4OkAze/E---3.1_1784.p',co1_13) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1l1K4OkAze/E---3.1_1784.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| app(sk1,cons(X1,nil)) != sk2
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1l1K4OkAze/E---3.1_1784.p',co1_12) ).
cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
( app(sk3,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk4
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1l1K4OkAze/E---3.1_1784.p',co1_14) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1l1K4OkAze/E---3.1_1784.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_13 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| app(sk1,cons(X1,nil)) != sk2
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_12 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( app(sk3,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk4
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_14 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ neq(sk2,nil) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( app(sk1,cons(X1,nil)) != sk2
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
app(sk1,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk2,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk5),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWC097-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 01:46:19 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1l1K4OkAze/E---3.1_1784.p
% 0.21/0.51 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # new_bool_1 with pid 1952 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1957 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 199
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 164
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses : 35
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 35
% 0.21/0.51 # Processed clauses : 54
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.21/0.51 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 48
% 0.21/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 24
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 15
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.21/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 57
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 30
% 0.21/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 53
% 0.21/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2553
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1984 pages
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1852 pages
% 0.21/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------