TSTP Solution File: SWC097+1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : SWC097+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:53:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.36s 0.82s
% Output : Proof 3.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC097+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 19:13:54 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 3.36/0.82 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 3.36/0.82
% 3.36/0.82 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.36/0.82
% 3.36/0.82 % SZS output start Proof
% 3.36/0.82 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax1, axiom, ![U]: (ssItem(U) => ![V]: (ssItem(V) => (neq(U, V) <=> U!=V)))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax13, axiom, ![U2]: (ssList(U2) => (duplicatefreeP(U2) <=> ![V2]: (ssItem(V2) => ![W]: (ssItem(W) => ![X]: (ssList(X) => ![Y]: (ssList(Y) => ![Z]: (ssList(Z) => (app(app(X, cons(V2, Y)), cons(W, Z))=U2 => V2!=W))))))))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax15, axiom, ![U2]: (ssList(U2) => ![V2]: (ssList(V2) => (neq(U2, V2) <=> U2!=V2)))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax18, axiom, ![U2]: (ssList(U2) => ![V2]: (ssItem(V2) => cons(V2, U2)!=U2))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax21, axiom, ![U2]: (ssList(U2) => ![V2]: (ssItem(V2) => nil!=cons(V2, U2)))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax33, axiom, ![U2]: (ssItem(U2) => ![V2]: (ssItem(V2) => (lt(U2, V2) => ~lt(V2, U2))))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax38, axiom, ![U2]: (ssItem(U2) => ~memberP(nil, U2))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax8, axiom, ![U2]: (ssList(U2) => (cyclefreeP(U2) <=> ![V2]: (ssItem(V2) => ![W2]: (ssItem(W2) => ![X2]: (ssList(X2) => ![Y2]: (ssList(Y2) => ![Z2]: (ssList(Z2) => (app(app(X2, cons(V2, Y2)), cons(W2, Z2))=U2 => ~(leq(V2, W2) & leq(W2, V2))))))))))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax90, axiom, ![U2]: (ssItem(U2) => ~lt(U2, U2))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax93, axiom, ![U2]: (ssItem(U2) => ![V2]: (ssItem(V2) => (lt(U2, V2) <=> (U2!=V2 & leq(U2, V2)))))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(ax94, axiom, ![U2]: (ssItem(U2) => ![V2]: (ssItem(V2) => (gt(U2, V2) => ~gt(V2, U2))))).
% 3.36/0.83 fof(co1, conjecture, ![U2]: (ssList(U2) => ![V2]: (ssList(V2) => ![W2]: (ssList(W2) => ![X2]: (ssList(X2) => (V2!=X2 | (U2!=W2 | ((~neq(V2, nil) | (?[Y2]: (ssItem(Y2) & app(U2, cons(Y2, nil))=V2) | ![Z2]: (ssItem(Z2) => app(W2, cons(Z2, nil))!=X2))) & (~neq(V2, nil) | neq(X2, nil)))))))))).
% 3.36/0.83
% 3.36/0.83 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 3.36/0.83 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 3.36/0.83 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 3.36/0.83 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 3.36/0.83 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 3.36/0.83 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 3.36/0.83 variables of u and v.
% 3.36/0.83 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 3.36/0.83 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 3.36/0.83
% 3.36/0.83 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 3.36/0.83
% 3.36/0.83 Axiom 1 (co1_1): u = w.
% 3.36/0.83 Axiom 2 (co1_2): v = x.
% 3.36/0.83 Axiom 3 (co1_11): fresh18(X, X) = x.
% 3.36/0.83 Axiom 4 (co1_12): fresh17(X, X) = true2.
% 3.36/0.83 Axiom 5 (co1_4): neq(v, nil) = true2.
% 3.36/0.83 Axiom 6 (co1_12): fresh17(neq(x, nil), true2) = ssItem(z).
% 3.36/0.83 Axiom 7 (co1_11): fresh18(neq(x, nil), true2) = app(w, cons(z, nil)).
% 3.36/0.83
% 3.36/0.83 Goal 1 (co1_10): tuple5(app(u, cons(X, nil)), ssItem(X), neq(x, nil)) = tuple5(v, true2, true2).
% 3.36/0.83 The goal is true when:
% 3.36/0.83 X = z
% 3.36/0.83
% 3.36/0.83 Proof:
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(app(u, cons(z, nil)), ssItem(z), neq(x, nil))
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 1 (co1_1) }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(app(w, cons(z, nil)), ssItem(z), neq(x, nil))
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 2 (co1_2) R->L }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(app(w, cons(z, nil)), ssItem(z), neq(v, nil))
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 5 (co1_4) }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(app(w, cons(z, nil)), ssItem(z), true2)
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 6 (co1_12) R->L }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(app(w, cons(z, nil)), fresh17(neq(x, nil), true2), true2)
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 2 (co1_2) R->L }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(app(w, cons(z, nil)), fresh17(neq(v, nil), true2), true2)
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 5 (co1_4) }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(app(w, cons(z, nil)), fresh17(true2, true2), true2)
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 4 (co1_12) }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(app(w, cons(z, nil)), true2, true2)
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 7 (co1_11) R->L }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(fresh18(neq(x, nil), true2), true2, true2)
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 2 (co1_2) R->L }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(fresh18(neq(v, nil), true2), true2, true2)
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 5 (co1_4) }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(fresh18(true2, true2), true2, true2)
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 3 (co1_11) }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(x, true2, true2)
% 3.36/0.83 = { by axiom 2 (co1_2) R->L }
% 3.36/0.83 tuple5(v, true2, true2)
% 3.36/0.83 % SZS output end Proof
% 3.36/0.83
% 3.36/0.83 RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------