TSTP Solution File: SWC094-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC094-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:59:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.90s 1.11s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWC094-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 20:04:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.45 The process was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.45 Sun Jun 12 20:04:44 2022
% 0.20/0.45 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 5297.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.45 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.45 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 list(usable).
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.45 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.45 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.45 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.45 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.20/0.45 136 back subsumes 135.
% 0.20/0.45 146 back subsumes 140.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 432 during input processing: 0 [copy,432,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 337.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 280.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 279.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 278.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 268.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 255.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 254.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 253.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 213.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 201.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 200.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 199.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 198.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 181.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 178.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 176.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 172.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 169.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 146.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 145.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 144.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 143.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 142.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 134.
% 0.20/0.45 432 back subsumes 133.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.47/0.64 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.47/0.64 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.47/0.64 number of clauses in intial UL: 334
% 0.47/0.64 number of clauses initially in problem: 399
% 0.47/0.64 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.47/0.64 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.47/0.64 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.47/0.64 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.47/0.64 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.47/0.64 distinct function count: 46
% 0.47/0.64 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.47/0.64
% 0.47/0.64 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.11 app(app(sk1,nil),sk1)=app(sk1,app(nil,sk1)).
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.90/1.11 40 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1277.3 K.
% 0.90/1.11 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.90/1.11 sym_ent ( 304) 182 0 182 0 54.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 term ( 32) 80766 75020 5746 10 179.9 K
% 0.90/1.11 rel ( 40) 58240 52031 6209 8 242.9 K
% 0.90/1.11 term_ptr ( 16) 24285 2649 21636 59 339.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 fpa_head ( 24) 2043 54 1989 5 46.7 K
% 0.90/1.11 fpa_tree ( 56) 11016 11016 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.90/1.11 context (1288) 16521 16521 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.90/1.11 trail ( 24) 126832 126832 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.90/1.11 imd_tree ( 32) 32 14 18 8 0.8 K
% 0.90/1.11 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 is_tree ( 24) 1396 119 1277 31 30.7 K
% 0.90/1.11 is_pos (2424) 64269 64269 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.90/1.11 fsub_pos ( 16) 8984 8984 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 literal ( 32) 19334 15497 3837 1 119.9 K
% 0.90/1.11 clause ( 88) 3521 2582 939 1 80.8 K
% 0.90/1.11 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.90/1.11 clash_nd ( 80) 5476 5476 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.90/1.11 clause_ptr ( 16) 869 114 755 6 11.9 K
% 0.90/1.11 int_ptr ( 16) 7953 4086 3867 6 60.5 K
% 0.90/1.11 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.11 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.90/1.11 me 0.00
% 0.90/1.11 hints time 0.00
% 0.90/1.11 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.90/1.11 conflict time 0.00
% 0.90/1.11 new demod time 0.00
% 0.90/1.11 post_process time 0.00
% 0.90/1.11 back demod time 0.00
% 0.90/1.11 back subsume 0.00
% 0.90/1.11 factor time 0.00
% 0.90/1.11 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.90/1.11 unindex time 0.00
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 true clauses given 1 (14.3%)
% 0.90/1.11 false clauses given 6
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 FALSE TRUE
% 0.90/1.11 2 0 4
% 0.90/1.11 3 35 8
% 0.90/1.11 4 7 0
% 0.90/1.11 5 1 0
% 0.90/1.11 7 0 29
% 0.90/1.11 9 1 20
% 0.90/1.11 10 0 2
% 0.90/1.11 11 0 44
% 0.90/1.11 12 3 15
% 0.90/1.11 13 0 25
% 0.90/1.11 14 0 9
% 0.90/1.11 15 0 22
% 0.90/1.11 16 0 17
% 0.90/1.11 17 0 12
% 0.90/1.11 18 0 1
% 0.90/1.11 19 0 6
% 0.90/1.11 21 0 18
% 0.90/1.11 22 0 10
% 0.90/1.11 23 0 6
% 0.90/1.11 tot: 47 248 (84.1% true)
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.90/1.11 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.90/1.11 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.90/1.11 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.90/1.11 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.90/1.11 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.90/1.11 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.90/1.11 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.90/1.11 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.90/1.11 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.90/1.11 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.90/1.11 All others: 592.
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.90/1.11
% 0.90/1.11 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------