TSTP Solution File: SWC071+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWC071+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:26:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 193 ( 67 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 48 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 226 ( 73 ~; 88 |; 40 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 24 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 29 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 0 sgn 35 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ? [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
& neq(X5,nil)
& segmentP(X2,X5)
& segmentP(X1,X5) )
| ( nil = X2
& nil = X1 )
| ( ! [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
=> ! [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
=> ! [X8] :
( ssList(X8)
=> ( cons(X6,nil) != X3
| app(app(X7,X3),X8) != X4
| ? [X9] :
( ssItem(X9)
& memberP(X7,X9)
& lt(X6,X9) )
| ? [X10] :
( ssItem(X10)
& memberP(X8,X10)
& lt(X10,X6) ) ) ) ) )
& ( nil != X4
| nil != X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co1) ).
fof(ax21,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> nil != cons(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax21) ).
fof(ax17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).
fof(ax15,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( neq(X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).
fof(ax56,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( segmentP(X1,X2)
=> segmentP(app(app(X3,X1),X4),X2) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax56) ).
fof(ax55,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> segmentP(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax55) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ? [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
& neq(X5,nil)
& segmentP(X2,X5)
& segmentP(X1,X5) )
| ( nil = X2
& nil = X1 )
| ( ! [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
=> ! [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
=> ! [X8] :
( ssList(X8)
=> ( cons(X6,nil) != X3
| app(app(X7,X3),X8) != X4
| ? [X9] :
( ssItem(X9)
& memberP(X7,X9)
& lt(X6,X9) )
| ? [X10] :
( ssItem(X10)
& memberP(X8,X10)
& lt(X10,X6) ) ) ) ) )
& ( nil != X4
| nil != X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X15,X19,X20] :
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& ( ~ ssList(X15)
| ~ neq(X15,nil)
| ~ segmentP(esk2_0,X15)
| ~ segmentP(esk1_0,X15) )
& ( nil != esk2_0
| nil != esk1_0 )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| ssItem(esk5_0) )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| ssItem(esk5_0) )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| ssList(esk6_0) )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| ssList(esk6_0) )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| ssList(esk7_0) )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| ssList(esk7_0) )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0 )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0 )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| app(app(esk6_0,esk3_0),esk7_0) = esk4_0 )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| app(app(esk6_0,esk3_0),esk7_0) = esk4_0 )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| ~ ssItem(X19)
| ~ memberP(esk6_0,X19)
| ~ lt(esk5_0,X19) )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| ~ ssItem(X19)
| ~ memberP(esk6_0,X19)
| ~ lt(esk5_0,X19) )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| ~ ssItem(X20)
| ~ memberP(esk7_0,X20)
| ~ lt(X20,esk5_0) )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| ~ ssItem(X20)
| ~ memberP(esk7_0,X20)
| ~ lt(X20,esk5_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X4)
| nil != cons(X4,X3) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax21])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0
| nil = esk4_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk5_0)
| nil = esk4_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(esk6_0,esk3_0),esk7_0) = esk4_0
| nil = esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( nil != cons(X1,X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk1_0
| nil = esk2_0 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk2_0
| ssItem(esk5_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( nil != esk1_0
| nil != esk2_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(esk7_0)
| nil = esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(esk6_0)
| nil = esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ neq(X3,X4)
| X3 != X4
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3) )
& ( X3 = X4
| neq(X3,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax15])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ~ ssList(X5)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| ~ ssList(X7)
| ~ ssList(X8)
| ~ segmentP(X5,X6)
| segmentP(app(app(X7,X5),X8),X6) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax56])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(esk6_0,esk1_0),esk7_0) = esk2_0
| nil = esk1_0 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
nil != esk1_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk1_0
| ssList(esk7_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk1_0
| ssList(esk6_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ segmentP(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ segmentP(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( neq(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( segmentP(app(app(X1,X2),X3),X4)
| ~ segmentP(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
app(app(esk6_0,esk1_0),esk7_0) = esk2_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk7_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk6_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = nil
| ~ segmentP(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ segmentP(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( segmentP(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ segmentP(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_33])]) ).
fof(c_0_36,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ ssList(X2)
| segmentP(X2,X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax55])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = nil
| ~ segmentP(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( segmentP(X1,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_32])]),c_0_24]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC071+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 11:14:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 40
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 28
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 12
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 26
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 23
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 15
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 24
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 57
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 82
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 82
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 153
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 32
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 119
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 13
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 438
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 359
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 18
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 421
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 12
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 97
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 78
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 233
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 1318
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 18
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1155
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 483
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 38
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 113
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13300
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.048 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3480 pages
% 0.24/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------