TSTP Solution File: SWC048+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWC048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:01:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.92s 1.14s
% Output   : Refutation 0.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWC048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 23:53:42 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.92/1.14  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.92/1.14  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.92/1.14  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.92/1.14  SPASS derived 896 clauses, backtracked 588 clauses, performed 31 splits and kept 1342 clauses.
% 0.92/1.14  SPASS allocated 99142 KBytes.
% 0.92/1.14  SPASS spent	0:00:00.77 on the problem.
% 0.92/1.14  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.92/1.14  		0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.92/1.14  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.92/1.14  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.92/1.14  		0:00:00.43 for the reduction.
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 76 :
% 0.92/1.14  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.92/1.14  1[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.14  2[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc4)*.
% 0.92/1.14  58[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* equal(nil,v).
% 0.92/1.14  59[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP1(u,v)* equal(nil,v).
% 0.92/1.14  60[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP1(u,v)* equal(nil,u).
% 0.92/1.14  64[0:Inp] ssList(u) ||  -> rearsegP(u,u)*.
% 0.92/1.14  65[0:Inp] ssList(u) ||  -> rearsegP(u,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  69[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> neq(skc5,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  70[0:Inp] || SkP1(skc4,skc5) -> neq(skc4,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  71[0:Inp] || SkP1(skc4,skc5) -> rearsegP(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.92/1.14  72[0:Inp] || equal(nil,u) -> SkP0(u,v)*.
% 0.92/1.14  95[0:Inp] ssList(u) || rearsegP(nil,u)* -> equal(nil,u).
% 0.92/1.14  155[0:Inp] ssList(u) || neq(u,nil) rearsegP(skc4,u) rearsegP(skc5,u)* SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> .
% 0.92/1.14  188[0:Inp] ssList(u) ssList(v) || equal(tl(u),tl(v))* equal(hd(u),hd(v)) -> equal(u,v) equal(nil,v) equal(nil,u).
% 0.92/1.14  232[0:Res:2.0,155.0] || neq(skc4,nil) rearsegP(skc5,skc4)* rearsegP(skc4,skc4) SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> .
% 0.92/1.14  272[0:Res:2.0,95.0] || rearsegP(nil,skc4)* -> equal(skc4,nil).
% 0.92/1.14  282[0:Res:2.0,64.0] ||  -> rearsegP(skc4,skc4)*.
% 0.92/1.14  283[0:Res:2.0,65.0] ||  -> rearsegP(skc4,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  286[0:Res:2.0,188.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc4),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc4,u) equal(skc4,nil).
% 0.92/1.14  404[0:Res:1.0,155.0] || neq(skc5,nil) rearsegP(skc5,skc5)* rearsegP(skc4,skc5) SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> .
% 0.92/1.14  454[0:Res:1.0,64.0] ||  -> rearsegP(skc5,skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.14  455[0:Res:1.0,65.0] ||  -> rearsegP(skc5,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  458[0:Res:1.0,188.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u) equal(skc5,nil).
% 0.92/1.14  546[0:MRR:232.2,282.0] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) rearsegP(skc5,skc4)* neq(skc4,nil) -> .
% 0.92/1.14  547[0:MRR:404.0,404.1,69.1,454.0] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) rearsegP(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  556[1:Spt:286.5] ||  -> equal(skc4,nil)**.
% 0.92/1.14  559[1:Rew:556.0,70.0] || SkP1(nil,skc5) -> neq(skc4,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  561[1:Rew:556.0,546.1] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) rearsegP(skc5,nil)* neq(skc4,nil) -> .
% 0.92/1.14  563[1:Rew:556.0,547.0] || SkP0(nil,skc5) rearsegP(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  564[1:Rew:556.0,69.0] || SkP0(nil,skc5) -> neq(skc5,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  668[1:Rew:556.0,283.0] ||  -> rearsegP(nil,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  713[1:Rew:556.0,559.1] || SkP1(nil,skc5) -> neq(nil,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  725[1:Rew:556.0,563.1] || SkP0(nil,skc5) rearsegP(nil,skc5)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  744[1:Rew:556.0,561.2,556.0,561.0] || SkP0(nil,skc5) rearsegP(skc5,nil)* neq(nil,nil) -> .
% 0.92/1.14  745[1:MRR:744.1,455.0] || SkP0(nil,skc5) neq(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  823[2:Spt:458.5] ||  -> equal(skc5,nil)**.
% 0.92/1.14  863[2:Rew:823.0,725.1] || SkP0(nil,skc5) rearsegP(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  990[2:Rew:823.0,863.0] || SkP0(nil,nil) rearsegP(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  991[2:MRR:990.1,668.0] || SkP0(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1078[2:Res:72.1,991.0] || equal(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1079[2:Obv:1078.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1080[2:Spt:1079.0,458.5,823.0] || equal(skc5,nil)** -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1081[2:Spt:1079.0,458.0,458.1,458.2,458.3,458.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u).
% 0.92/1.14  1107[3:Spt:564.0] || SkP0(nil,skc5)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1108[3:Res:72.1,1107.0] || equal(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1111[3:Obv:1108.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1112[3:Spt:1111.0,564.0,1107.0] ||  -> SkP0(nil,skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.14  1113[3:Spt:1111.0,564.1] ||  -> neq(skc5,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  1114[3:MRR:745.0,1112.0] || neq(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1115[3:MRR:713.1,1114.0] || SkP1(nil,skc5)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1117[3:Res:59.0,1115.0] ||  -> equal(skc5,nil)**.
% 0.92/1.14  1119[3:MRR:1117.0,1080.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1120[1:Spt:1119.0,286.5,556.0] || equal(skc4,nil)** -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1121[1:Spt:1119.0,286.0,286.1,286.2,286.3,286.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc4),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc4,u).
% 0.92/1.14  1125[1:MRR:272.1,1120.0] || rearsegP(nil,skc4)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1136[2:Spt:458.5] ||  -> equal(skc5,nil)**.
% 0.92/1.14  1282[2:Rew:1136.0,71.0] || SkP1(skc4,nil) -> rearsegP(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.92/1.14  1302[2:Rew:1136.0,1282.1] || SkP1(skc4,nil) -> rearsegP(nil,skc4)*.
% 0.92/1.14  1303[2:MRR:1302.1,1125.0] || SkP1(skc4,nil)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1409[2:Res:60.0,1303.0] ||  -> equal(skc4,nil)**.
% 0.92/1.14  1410[2:MRR:1409.0,1120.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1411[2:Spt:1410.0,458.5,1136.0] || equal(skc5,nil)** -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1412[2:Spt:1410.0,458.0,458.1,458.2,458.3,458.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u).
% 0.92/1.14  1452[3:Spt:69.0] || SkP0(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1454[3:Res:58.0,1452.0] ||  -> equal(skc5,nil)**.
% 0.92/1.14  1455[3:MRR:1454.0,1411.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1456[3:Spt:1455.0,69.0,1452.0] ||  -> SkP0(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.14  1457[3:Spt:1455.0,69.1] ||  -> neq(skc5,nil)*.
% 0.92/1.14  1459[3:MRR:546.0,1456.0] || rearsegP(skc5,skc4)* neq(skc4,nil) -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1467[4:Spt:71.0] || SkP1(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1469[4:Res:60.0,1467.0] ||  -> equal(skc4,nil)**.
% 0.92/1.14  1471[4:MRR:1469.0,1120.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1472[4:Spt:1471.0,71.0,1467.0] ||  -> SkP1(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.14  1473[4:Spt:1471.0,71.1] ||  -> rearsegP(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.92/1.14  1474[4:MRR:1459.0,1473.0] || neq(skc4,nil)* -> .
% 0.92/1.14  1475[4:MRR:70.0,70.1,1472.0,1474.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.14  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.92/1.14  Formulae used in the proof : co1 ax49 ax51 ax52 ax77
% 0.92/1.14  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------