TSTP Solution File: SWC043+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWC043+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:13:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.45s 2.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 24 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 40 ( 23 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_199,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = nil,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9crh9o74/lgb.p',i_0_199) ).
cnf(i_0_198,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9crh9o74/lgb.p',i_0_198) ).
cnf(i_0_194,negated_conjecture,
app(esk50_0,esk52_0) = esk51_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9crh9o74/lgb.p',i_0_194) ).
cnf(i_0_203,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk48_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9crh9o74/lgb.p',i_0_203) ).
cnf(i_0_197,negated_conjecture,
esk48_0 = esk50_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9crh9o74/lgb.p',i_0_197) ).
cnf(i_0_158,plain,
( nil = X1
| app(X2,X1) != nil
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9crh9o74/lgb.p',i_0_158) ).
cnf(i_0_195,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk52_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9crh9o74/lgb.p',i_0_195) ).
cnf(i_0_202,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk49_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9crh9o74/lgb.p',i_0_202) ).
cnf(i_0_196,negated_conjecture,
esk48_0 != nil,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9crh9o74/lgb.p',i_0_196) ).
cnf(i_0_157,plain,
( nil = X1
| app(X1,X2) != nil
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9crh9o74/lgb.p',i_0_157) ).
cnf(c_0_214,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = nil,
i_0_199 ).
cnf(c_0_215,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
i_0_198 ).
cnf(c_0_216,negated_conjecture,
app(esk50_0,esk52_0) = esk51_0,
i_0_194 ).
cnf(c_0_217,negated_conjecture,
esk51_0 = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_214,c_0_215]) ).
cnf(c_0_218,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk48_0),
i_0_203 ).
cnf(c_0_219,negated_conjecture,
esk48_0 = esk50_0,
i_0_197 ).
cnf(c_0_220,plain,
( nil = X1
| app(X2,X1) != nil
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
i_0_158 ).
cnf(c_0_221,negated_conjecture,
app(esk50_0,esk52_0) = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_216,c_0_217]) ).
cnf(c_0_222,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk50_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_218,c_0_219]) ).
cnf(c_0_223,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk52_0),
i_0_195 ).
cnf(c_0_224,negated_conjecture,
esk52_0 = nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_220,c_0_221]),c_0_222]),c_0_223])]) ).
cnf(c_0_225,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk49_0),
i_0_202 ).
cnf(c_0_226,negated_conjecture,
esk48_0 != nil,
i_0_196 ).
cnf(c_0_227,plain,
( nil = X1
| app(X1,X2) != nil
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
i_0_157 ).
cnf(c_0_228,negated_conjecture,
app(esk50_0,nil) = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_221,c_0_224]) ).
cnf(c_0_229,negated_conjecture,
ssList(nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_225,c_0_215]),c_0_217]) ).
cnf(c_0_230,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 != nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_226,c_0_219]) ).
cnf(c_0_231,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_227,c_0_228]),c_0_229]),c_0_222])]),c_0_230]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWC043+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 20:55:00 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.44 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.45/2.36 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.45/2.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.45/2.36 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.45/2.36 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4d
% 7.45/2.36 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 7.45/2.36 #
% 7.45/2.36 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.45/2.36
% 7.45/2.36 # Proof found!
% 7.45/2.36 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.45/2.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.45/2.36 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.45/2.36
% 7.45/2.36 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.45/2.36 # User time : 0.028 s
% 7.45/2.36 # System time : 0.000 s
% 7.45/2.36 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 7.45/2.36 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.45/2.36
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------