TSTP Solution File: SWC042-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWC042-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:39:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 1.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 21 unt; 0 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 33 ( 21 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.920fBuBHFo/E---3.1_6681.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
nil = sk2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.920fBuBHFo/E---3.1_6681.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
app(sk3,sk5) = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.920fBuBHFo/E---3.1_6681.p',co1_10) ).
cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.920fBuBHFo/E---3.1_6681.p',co1_1) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.920fBuBHFo/E---3.1_6681.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(clause119,axiom,
( nil = X2
| app(X1,X2) != nil
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.920fBuBHFo/E---3.1_6681.p',clause119) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.920fBuBHFo/E---3.1_6681.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
nil != sk1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.920fBuBHFo/E---3.1_6681.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(clause73,axiom,
( app(X1,nil) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.920fBuBHFo/E---3.1_6681.p',clause73) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
nil = sk2,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
app(sk3,sk5) = sk4,
co1_10 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
sk4 = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
co1_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( nil = X2
| app(X1,X2) != nil
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
clause119 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
app(sk3,sk5) = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk5),
co1_9 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
sk5 = nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
nil != sk1,
co1_8 ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
( app(X1,nil) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
clause73 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
app(sk3,nil) = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
sk3 != nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_18])]),c_0_23]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/1.59 % Problem : SWC042-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.14/1.60 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/1.81 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.16/1.81 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/1.81 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/1.81 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/1.81 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/1.81 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/1.81 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/1.81 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 01:39:28 EDT 2023
% 0.16/1.81 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.95 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/1.95 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.920fBuBHFo/E---3.1_6681.p
% 0.22/1.97 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/1.97 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/1.97 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/1.97 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/1.97 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/1.97 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/1.97 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/1.97 # new_bool_3 with pid 6786 completed with status 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/1.97 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/1.97 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/1.97 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/1.97 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/1.97 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/1.97 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/1.97 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/1.97 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/1.97 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 6791 completed with status 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/1.97 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/1.97 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/1.97 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/1.97 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/1.97 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/1.97 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/1.97 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/1.97 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/1.97 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.97 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/1.97
% 0.22/1.97 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.97 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/1.97 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.97 # Parsed axioms : 198
% 0.22/1.97 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 139
% 0.22/1.97 # Initial clauses : 59
% 0.22/1.97 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Initial clauses in saturation : 59
% 0.22/1.97 # Processed clauses : 91
% 0.22/1.97 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.22/1.97 # ...subsumed : 5
% 0.22/1.97 # ...remaining for further processing : 82
% 0.22/1.97 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 0.22/1.97 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.22/1.97 # Generated clauses : 11
% 0.22/1.97 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.22/1.97 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.22/1.97 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 0.22/1.97 # Total rewrite steps : 20
% 0.22/1.97 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/1.97 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/1.97 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/1.97 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/1.97 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/1.97 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/1.97 # Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 0.22/1.97 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.22/1.97 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/1.97 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.22/1.97 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.22/1.97 # ...number of literals in the above : 140
% 0.22/1.97 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Current number of archived clauses : 53
% 0.22/1.97 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 563
% 0.22/1.97 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
% 0.22/1.97 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.22/1.97 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.22/1.97 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.22/1.97 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.22/1.97 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.97 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3304
% 0.22/1.97
% 0.22/1.97 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.97 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/1.97 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/1.97 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.22/1.97 # Maximum resident set size: 1932 pages
% 0.22/1.97
% 0.22/1.97 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.97 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.22/1.97 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/1.97 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/1.97 # Maximum resident set size: 1852 pages
% 0.22/1.97 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/1.97 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------