TSTP Solution File: SWC041+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWC041+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:41:11 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 96 ( 52 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 110 ( 37 ~; 34 |; 25 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 13 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 26 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn; 19 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( nil != X2
| X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| nil = X1
| ! [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
=> ( app(X3,X5) != X4
| ~ equalelemsP(X3)
| ? [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
& ? [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
& app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
& ? [X8] :
( ssList(X8)
& app(X8,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 ) ) ) ) )
| ( nil != X4
& nil = X3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RVLbSXI8WD/E---3.1_1089.p',co1) ).
fof(ax83,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( nil = app(X1,X2)
<=> ( nil = X2
& nil = X1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RVLbSXI8WD/E---3.1_1089.p',ax83) ).
fof(ax84,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RVLbSXI8WD/E---3.1_1089.p',ax84) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( nil != X2
| X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| nil = X1
| ! [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
=> ( app(X3,X5) != X4
| ~ equalelemsP(X3)
| ? [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
& ? [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
& app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
& ? [X8] :
( ssList(X8)
& app(X8,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 ) ) ) ) )
| ( nil != X4
& nil = X3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X14,X15,X16] :
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& nil = esk2_0
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& nil != esk1_0
& ssList(esk5_0)
& app(esk3_0,esk5_0) = esk4_0
& equalelemsP(esk3_0)
& ( ~ ssItem(X14)
| ~ ssList(X15)
| app(cons(X14,nil),X15) != esk5_0
| ~ ssList(X16)
| app(X16,cons(X14,nil)) != esk3_0 )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| nil != esk3_0 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
nil = esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X39,X40] :
( ( nil = X40
| nil != app(X39,X40)
| ~ ssList(X40)
| ~ ssList(X39) )
& ( nil = X39
| nil != app(X39,X40)
| ~ ssList(X40)
| ~ ssList(X39) )
& ( nil != X40
| nil != X39
| nil = app(X39,X40)
| ~ ssList(X40)
| ~ ssList(X39) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax83])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
app(esk3_0,esk5_0) = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( nil = X1
| nil != app(X2,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
app(esk3_0,esk5_0) = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk3_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X41] :
( ~ ssList(X41)
| app(X41,nil) = X41 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax84])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
esk5_0 = nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
nil != esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( app(X1,nil) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
app(esk3_0,nil) = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 != nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_14])]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11 % Problem : SWC041+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.05/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:19:01 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RVLbSXI8WD/E---3.1_1089.p
% 0.16/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # new_bool_3 with pid 1174 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1179 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.46
% 0.16/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.16/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 76
% 0.16/0.46 # Initial clauses : 45
% 0.16/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 45
% 0.16/0.46 # Processed clauses : 71
% 0.16/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.16/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 67
% 0.16/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.16/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.16/0.46 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.16/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.16/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.16/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.16/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 18
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.16/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.16/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20
% 0.16/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 79
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 44
% 0.16/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 148
% 0.16/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.16/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.16/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.16/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.16/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4007
% 0.16/0.46
% 0.16/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.46 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
% 0.16/0.46
% 0.16/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.46 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.46 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
% 0.16/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------