TSTP Solution File: SWC040+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : SWC040+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:49:20 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 11.63s 2.37s
% Output : Proof 17.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWC040+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 15:26:01 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.60 ________ _____
% 0.19/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.19/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.19/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.60 (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.60 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 5.07/1.49 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 5.64/1.51 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 5.74/1.54 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 5.74/1.54 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 5.74/1.54 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 5.74/1.54 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 5.74/1.54 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 11.63/2.35 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.63/2.37 Prover 2: proved (1741ms)
% 11.63/2.37
% 11.63/2.37 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.63/2.37
% 12.08/2.37 Prover 0: stopped
% 12.08/2.40 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 12.08/2.40 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 13.13/2.52 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.13/2.52 Prover 5: stopped
% 13.13/2.52 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 13.82/2.66 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 13.82/2.67 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 13.82/2.67 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.82/2.67 Prover 6: stopped
% 14.31/2.68 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.31/2.68 Prover 3: stopped
% 14.31/2.69 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 14.31/2.69 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 14.31/2.76 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 14.31/2.77 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.31/2.78 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 14.31/2.78 Prover 1: proved (2154ms)
% 14.31/2.80 Prover 10: stopped
% 14.31/2.82 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 15.17/2.87 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 16.13/2.94 Prover 13: stopped
% 16.13/2.95 Prover 11: stopped
% 16.13/2.96 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.13/2.96 Prover 7: stopped
% 16.54/3.02 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 16.54/3.04 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.54/3.04 Prover 8: stopped
% 17.63/3.23 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.63/3.23 Prover 4: stopped
% 17.63/3.24
% 17.63/3.24 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 17.63/3.24
% 17.63/3.24 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 17.63/3.26 Assumptions after simplification:
% 17.63/3.26 ---------------------------------
% 17.63/3.26
% 17.63/3.26 (co1)
% 17.63/3.26 $false
% 17.63/3.26
% 17.63/3.26 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 17.63/3.26 --------------------------------------------
% 17.63/3.26 ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20,
% 17.63/3.26 ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32,
% 17.63/3.26 ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44,
% 17.63/3.26 ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56,
% 17.63/3.26 ax57, ax58, ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68,
% 17.63/3.26 ax69, ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8,
% 17.63/3.26 ax80, ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91,
% 17.63/3.26 ax92, ax93, ax94, ax95
% 17.63/3.26
% 17.63/3.26 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 17.63/3.26 ---------------------------------
% 17.63/3.26
% 17.63/3.26 Begin of proof
% 17.63/3.27 |
% 17.63/3.27 | CLOSE: (co1) is inconsistent.
% 17.63/3.27 |
% 17.63/3.27 End of proof
% 17.63/3.27 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 17.63/3.27
% 17.63/3.27 2663ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------