TSTP Solution File: SWC032-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : SWC032-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 15:47:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 33 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 24 ~; 22 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 2 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f888,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f887]) ).
fof(f887,plain,
nil != nil,
inference(superposition,[],[f848,f877]) ).
fof(f877,plain,
nil = sk2,
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f190,f847]) ).
fof(f847,plain,
nil = sk4,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f839]) ).
fof(f839,plain,
( nil != nil
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f236,f833]) ).
fof(f833,plain,
nil = sk1,
inference(resolution,[],[f832,f186]) ).
fof(f186,axiom,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).
fof(f832,plain,
( ~ ssList(sk1)
| nil = sk1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f831,f192]) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
ssList(sk5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f831,plain,
( ~ ssList(sk5)
| nil = sk1
| ~ ssList(sk1) ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f830]) ).
fof(f830,plain,
( nil != nil
| ~ ssList(sk1)
| nil = sk1
| ~ ssList(sk5) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f829]) ).
fof(f829,plain,
( nil != nil
| ~ ssList(sk1)
| nil = sk1
| ~ ssList(sk5)
| nil = sk1 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f825,f197]) ).
fof(f197,axiom,
( nil = sk2
| nil = sk1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
fof(f825,plain,
( nil != sk2
| ~ ssList(sk1)
| nil = sk1
| ~ ssList(sk5) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f118,f235]) ).
fof(f235,plain,
sk2 = app(sk1,sk5),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f234,f190]) ).
fof(f234,plain,
sk4 = app(sk1,sk5),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f193,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f193,axiom,
sk4 = app(sk3,sk5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
fof(f118,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( nil != app(X0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| nil = X0
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause118) ).
fof(f236,plain,
( nil != sk1
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f196,f191]) ).
fof(f196,axiom,
( nil != sk3
| nil = sk4 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
fof(f848,plain,
nil != sk2,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f836]) ).
fof(f836,plain,
( nil != nil
| nil != sk2 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f200,f833]) ).
fof(f200,axiom,
( nil != sk2
| nil != sk1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_15) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWC032-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 04:37:59 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % (16944)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.13/0.37 % (16947)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.13/0.37 % (16951)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (16946)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (16949)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (16948)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (16950)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (16947)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (16945)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.38 TRYING [1]
% 0.13/0.38 TRYING [2]
% 0.13/0.39 TRYING [3]
% 0.13/0.40 TRYING [1]
% 0.13/0.40 TRYING [2]
% 0.13/0.40 % (16950)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.40 % (16950)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.40 % (16950)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.40 % (16950)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.13/0.40 % (16950)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 % (16950)Memory used [KB]: 1450
% 0.13/0.40 % (16950)Time elapsed: 0.029 s
% 0.13/0.40 % (16950)Instructions burned: 54 (million)
% 0.13/0.40 % (16950)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.40 % (16950)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.40 % (16944)Success in time 0.049 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------