TSTP Solution File: SWC032+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWC032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:01:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.70s 0.90s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWC032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:08:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.70/0.90  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.70/0.90  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.70/0.90  SPASS derived 765 clauses, backtracked 379 clauses, performed 18 splits and kept 1027 clauses.
% 0.70/0.90  SPASS allocated 98997 KBytes.
% 0.70/0.90  SPASS spent	0:00:00.54 on the problem.
% 0.70/0.90  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.70/0.90  		0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.70/0.90  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.70/0.90  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.70/0.90  		0:00:00.27 for the reduction.
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 36 :
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.90  1[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc7)*.
% 0.70/0.90  2[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc6)*.
% 0.70/0.90  3[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc5)*.
% 0.70/0.90  60[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(app(skc5,skc7),skc6)**.
% 0.70/0.90  61[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* equal(nil,v).
% 0.70/0.90  70[0:Inp] || equal(skc5,nil) -> equal(skc6,nil)**.
% 0.70/0.90  71[0:Inp] || equal(nil,u) -> SkP0(u,v)*.
% 0.70/0.90  81[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc6,skc5)* SkP0(skc5,skc6) -> .
% 0.70/0.90  130[0:Inp] ssList(u) ssList(v) || equal(app(v,u),nil)** -> equal(nil,v).
% 0.70/0.90  187[0:Inp] ssList(u) ssList(v) || equal(tl(u),tl(v))* equal(hd(u),hd(v)) -> equal(u,v) equal(nil,v) equal(nil,u).
% 0.70/0.90  250[0:Res:3.0,130.0] ssList(u) || equal(app(skc5,u),nil)** -> equal(skc5,nil).
% 0.70/0.90  289[0:Res:3.0,187.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u) equal(skc5,nil).
% 0.70/0.90  462[0:Res:2.0,187.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc6),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc6),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc6,u) equal(skc6,nil).
% 0.70/0.90  561[1:Spt:462.5] ||  -> equal(skc6,nil)**.
% 0.70/0.90  674[1:Rew:561.0,60.0] ||  -> equal(app(skc5,skc7),nil)**.
% 0.70/0.90  675[1:Rew:561.0,81.0] || SkP0(nil,skc5) SkP0(skc5,skc6)* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  733[1:Rew:561.0,675.1] || SkP0(nil,skc5) SkP0(skc5,nil)* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  821[2:Spt:289.5] ||  -> equal(skc5,nil)**.
% 0.70/0.90  975[2:Rew:821.0,733.0] || SkP0(nil,nil) SkP0(skc5,nil)* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  993[2:Rew:821.0,975.1] || SkP0(nil,nil)* SkP0(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  994[2:Obv:993.0] || SkP0(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1074[2:Res:71.1,994.0] || equal(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1075[2:Obv:1074.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1076[2:Spt:1075.0,289.5,821.0] || equal(skc5,nil)** -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1077[2:Spt:1075.0,289.0,289.1,289.2,289.3,289.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u).
% 0.70/0.90  1086[2:MRR:250.2,1076.0] ssList(u) || equal(app(skc5,u),nil)** -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1157[2:SpL:674.0,1086.1] ssList(skc7) || equal(nil,nil)* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1160[2:Obv:1157.1] ssList(skc7) ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1161[2:SSi:1160.0,1.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1162[1:Spt:1161.0,462.5,561.0] || equal(skc6,nil)** -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1163[1:Spt:1161.0,462.0,462.1,462.2,462.3,462.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc6),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc6),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc6,u).
% 0.70/0.90  1169[1:MRR:70.1,1162.0] || equal(skc5,nil)** -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1218[0:Res:61.0,81.0] || SkP0(skc5,skc6)* -> equal(skc5,nil).
% 0.70/0.90  1219[1:MRR:1218.1,1169.0] || SkP0(skc5,skc6)* -> .
% 0.70/0.90  1222[1:Res:61.0,1219.0] ||  -> equal(skc6,nil)**.
% 0.70/0.90  1223[1:MRR:1222.0,1162.0] ||  -> .
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.70/0.90  Formulae used in the proof : co1 ax83 ax77
% 0.70/0.90  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------