TSTP Solution File: SWC032+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWC032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:13:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.44s 2.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  110 (  63 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   26 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  136 (  46   ~;  44   |;  33   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   27 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn  18   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ! [X5] :
                        ( ssList(X5)
                       => ( app(X3,X5) != X4
                          | ~ strictorderedP(X3)
                          | ? [X6] :
                              ( ssItem(X6)
                              & ? [X7] :
                                  ( ssList(X7)
                                  & app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
                                  & ? [X8] :
                                      ( ssItem(X8)
                                      & ? [X9] :
                                          ( ssList(X9)
                                          & app(X9,cons(X8,nil)) = X3
                                          & lt(X8,X6) ) ) ) ) ) )
                    | ( nil != X4
                      & nil = X3 )
                    | ( ( nil != X2
                        | nil = X1 )
                      & ( nil != X1
                        | nil = X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(ax83,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( nil = app(X1,X2)
          <=> ( nil = X2
              & nil = X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax83) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ! [X5] :
                          ( ssList(X5)
                         => ( app(X3,X5) != X4
                            | ~ strictorderedP(X3)
                            | ? [X6] :
                                ( ssItem(X6)
                                & ? [X7] :
                                    ( ssList(X7)
                                    & app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
                                    & ? [X8] :
                                        ( ssItem(X8)
                                        & ? [X9] :
                                            ( ssList(X9)
                                            & app(X9,cons(X8,nil)) = X3
                                            & lt(X8,X6) ) ) ) ) ) )
                      | ( nil != X4
                        & nil = X3 )
                      | ( ( nil != X2
                          | nil = X1 )
                        & ( nil != X1
                          | nil = X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X259,X260,X261,X262] :
      ( ssList(esk48_0)
      & ssList(esk49_0)
      & ssList(esk50_0)
      & ssList(esk51_0)
      & esk49_0 = esk51_0
      & esk48_0 = esk50_0
      & ssList(esk52_0)
      & app(esk50_0,esk52_0) = esk51_0
      & strictorderedP(esk50_0)
      & ( ~ ssItem(X259)
        | ~ ssList(X260)
        | app(cons(X259,nil),X260) != esk52_0
        | ~ ssItem(X261)
        | ~ ssList(X262)
        | app(X262,cons(X261,nil)) != esk50_0
        | ~ lt(X261,X259) )
      & ( nil = esk51_0
        | nil != esk50_0 )
      & ( nil = esk48_0
        | nil = esk49_0 )
      & ( nil != esk49_0
        | nil = esk49_0 )
      & ( nil = esk48_0
        | nil != esk48_0 )
      & ( nil != esk49_0
        | nil != esk48_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != esk49_0
    | nil != esk48_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    esk48_0 = esk50_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    esk49_0 = esk51_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk51_0
    | nil != esk50_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk50_0 != nil
    | esk51_0 != nil ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk48_0
    | nil = esk49_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    esk50_0 != nil,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X228,X229] :
      ( ( nil = X229
        | nil != app(X228,X229)
        | ~ ssList(X229)
        | ~ ssList(X228) )
      & ( nil = X228
        | nil != app(X228,X229)
        | ~ ssList(X229)
        | ~ ssList(X228) )
      & ( nil != X229
        | nil != X228
        | nil = app(X228,X229)
        | ~ ssList(X229)
        | ~ ssList(X228) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax83])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk50_0,esk52_0) = esk51_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    esk51_0 = nil,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_5]),c_0_6]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk48_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( nil = X1
    | nil != app(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk50_0,esk52_0) = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk52_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk50_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_10]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem  : SWC032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:02:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.48  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.44/2.48  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.44/2.48  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.44/2.48  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.44/2.48  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 7.44/2.48  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.44/2.48  #
% 7.44/2.48  # Preprocessing time       : 0.021 s
% 7.44/2.48  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.44/2.48  
% 7.44/2.48  # Proof found!
% 7.44/2.48  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.44/2.48  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.44/2.48  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.44/2.48  
% 7.44/2.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.44/2.48  # User time                : 0.030 s
% 7.44/2.48  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.44/2.48  # Total time               : 0.036 s
% 7.44/2.48  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.44/2.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------